Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40641486›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2025

The Constructive Neutral Evolution of Behaviour.

Andrew M Catherall-Ostler, Tanmay Dixit

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Andrew M Catherall-OstlerHomerton College University of Cambridge Cambridge UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-9593-0499
Tanmay DixitDepartment of Zoology University of Cambridge Cambridge UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5604-7965

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is an unrecognised disagreement between those studying molecular evolution and those studying behavioural evolution. Only natural selection is ordinarily thought to systematically increase behavioural complexity, but molecular biologists are increasingly recognising a second driver of complexity-constructive neutral evolution (CNE). CNE occurs when a system contains components that buffer the effects of otherwise-deleterious mutations, allowing such mutations to spread. This increases the complexity of the system due to the dependency that now exists between the buffering component and the mutated component. A probabilistic 'ratchet' means this process is more likely to repeat itself than reverse, and hence complexity increases without necessarily any gain in function. Here, we argue that CNE operates not only at the molecular level, but also affects whole organism behaviour. We suggest that behaviour's polygenic architecture, flexibility, and ability to mitigate the impact of otherwise-deleterious mutations mean that behaviour is particularly likely to evolve via CNE. We summarise the evidence that supports this hypothesis as well as suggesting how it could be tested further. We conclude that CNE must be considered alongside selective explanations for increases in behavioural complexity.

Indexed as

behaviourconstructive neutral evolutionmolecular evolutionmutationsnonadaptive evolutiontrait evolution

Identifiers

PMID40641486
PMCPMC12245481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.