ArticleRwanda journal of medicine and health sciences2022
'I want to live for them'; Determinants of Uptake of Clinical Breast Examination: A Qualitative Inquiry.
Article in Rwanda journal of medicine and health sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Breast cancer screening uptake and its associated factors among women in Ghana: evidence from the 2022 Demographic and Health Survey.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025Article
- Breast cancer screening motivation among women: an application of self-determination theory.BMC primary care · 2024Article
- Factors associated with the uptake of clinical breast examination among women of reproductive age in Lesotho: analysis of a national survey.BMC cancer · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Clinical breast examination is still relevant in resource-constrained countries for the early detection of breast cancer. Uptake of breast cancer screening programmes in developing countries remains low. It is imperative to explore the factors that influence women's decision to participate in screening services. Objective: To examine the perceptions, motivations, and barriers to uptake of clinical breast examination. Methods: This was a descriptive qualitative inquiry. Twelve women who participated in clinical breast examinations were purposively sampled for semi-structured interviews. Interviews were audio-taped, transcribed verbatim, and thematically analysed. Results: Fear of death, personal interest, excellent customer service, and public education motivated participation in the clinical breast examination. Perceived benefits included psychological relief, early detection, inspiring other women, and the acquisition of skills and knowledge. Anxiety about being diagnosed with breast cancer, financial constraints, poor service delivery, and peer pressure were the perceived barriers. Participants who felt anxious about breast cancer performed self-breast examinations more often than the standard practice. The knowledge of participants about breast cancer and breast cancer screening techniques was generally poor. Conclusion: Health interventions designed to promote health seeking behaviors need to be realigned to reflect the evidence on the factors influencing the uptake of these interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.