ArticleJournal of animal science2025
Genome-wide association analysis reveals the genetic basis of ionomic variation in duck breast muscle.
Article in Journal of animal science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mineral elements are crucial for biological functions, with meat serving as a key dietary source. Despite advances in ionome analysis, the genetic mechanisms regulating mineral accumulation in meat remain poorly understood. Here, we analyze the ionome of 376 breast muscles from the large gradient consanguinity segregating population generated by Pekin duck × Liancheng white duck crosses, quantifying 7 essential mineral elements (potassium (K), phosphorus (P), sodium (Na), magnesium (Mg), calcium (Ca), iron (Fe), and zinc (Zn)). Notably, Ca exhibited the most pronounced variation between Pekin duck and Liancheng white duck (fold change = 1.83, P < 0.01). Correlation analysis demonstrated significant positive relationships between Zn and Ca (r = 0.49), Na (r = 0.41), and (all P < 0.001), while negative correlations were observed between Na and K (r = -0.29) (P < 0.001). We then analyzed correlations between the ionomic profiles and growth and meat quality traits. Importantly, Ca concentrations showed strong negative correlations with both breast muscle thickness (r = -0.72) and body weight (r = -0.76) (both P < 0.01), but positively correlated with meat lightness (r = 0.54, P < 0.01). To elucidate the genetic architecture underlying the duck pectoralis muscle ionome, we first estimated its narrow-sense heritability, which ranged from 0.19 to 0.58 across different mineral elements. Through comprehensive genetic analyses incorporating genome-wide association studies, linkage disequilibrium mapping, gene annotation, and expression profiling, we identified 2 key genes (SLC25A25 and ATP2B2) on chromosomes 18 and 13 that collectively regulated Ca content. These lead single nucleotide polymorphisms in these loci explained 39.91% and 11.07% of the phenotypic variance, respectively. Notably, the lead SNP on Chr18 also demonstrated pleiotropic effects, contributing to both meat lightness (PVE = 14.79%) and breast muscle thickness (PVE = 1.79%). Furthermore, on chromosome 2, we discovered a significant SNP associated with both Na and Ca concentrations, accounting for 12.6% and 4.35% of phenotypic variation, respectively. Further analysis pinpointed gene SLC25A32 as the most promising candidate within this genomic region. These findings enhance our comprehension of the genetic basis underlying ion content in meat and offer valuable insights for refining breeding programs, while also providing a new direction for the combat hidden hunger through meat biofortification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.