ArticleAmerican journal of primatology2025
Impact of Aggression on Bystanders: Quadratic Post-Conflict Affiliation in Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).
Article in American journal of primatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Affiliation as a Social Tension Buffer in the Aftermath of Street Fights.Human nature (Hawthorne, N.Y.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In social animals, aggression is a group matter not involving only the opponents. Witnessing a conflict can induce tension and distress in bystanders (i.e., individuals not involved in either the conflict or post-conflict affiliation with the aggressor and aggressee). For this reason, bystanders can engage in post-conflict affiliative exchanges to reduce tension and distress, a phenomenon known as Quadratic Post-Conflict Affiliation (QPCA). This study investigated the occurrence of QPCA in a group of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes, N = 15) housed at ZooParc de Beauval, France. Our findings confirmed the presence of QPCA in chimpanzees under study (group QPCA tendency: 5.60% ± 2.55 SE). QPCA was primarily directed towards males, who usually tended to be more influenced by the ongoing aggression and could potentially redirect further aggression towards bystanders. High-ranking bystanders were contacted more frequently than low-ranking ones, as the former can potentially provide immediate protection against other aggressors and offer greater tolerance. Additionally, bystanders were less frequently targeted by aggression when QPCA was present than when it was absent. Thus, QPCA may function as a protective mechanism against aggression by other group members by reducing the chance that bystanders become victims for redirected aggression (Bystander Protection Hypothesis). However, QPCA failed in reducing the levels of bystanders' anxiety-related behaviors. In conclusion, QPCA may be one of the behavioral strategies used by chimpanzees to navigate social challenges, maintain group cohesion, and mitigate aggression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.