ReviewTechnology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine2025
Objective assessment of the influence of malocclusion and orthodontic devices on facial and smile esthetics in laypeople via eye-tracking technology: A systematic review of clinical studies.
Review in Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It carries an expression of concern. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The influence of varying degrees of maxillary gingival display on perception of smile aesthetics: A dynamic smile visualisation study.Journal of orthodontics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Expression of concern
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BackgroundUnderstanding patients' psychological, anatomical, and functional needs helps clinicians identify issues affecting smile aesthetics, improving orthodontic outcomes and quality of life.ObjectivesThis review examined laypeople's esthetic perceptions of malocclusion and orthodontic appliances via eye-tracking technology, considering gender and professional background influences.MethodsA systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Ovid MEDLINE, and ProQuest. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute tools. Data on eye fixation metrics and subjective ratings were descriptively synthesized.ResultsAmong 7009 studies, 27 met inclusion criteria (11 high, 10 moderate, and 6 low RoB) with variable methodologies. Ethnic and cultural factors were rarely considered. The eyes received the most attention in facial aesthetics. However, severe malocclusion and orthodontic appliances redirected gaze to the mouth, while attractive facial features mitigated this effect. Laypeople were more tolerant of malocclusion than dental professionals, who were more sensitive to malocclusion deviations. Facial esthetic perception revealed gender-related differences, where females focusing more on the eyes and males on the mouth and nose.ConclusionsMalocclusion and orthodontic appliances affect esthetic perception by altering gaze patterns. Integrating eye-tracking technology into orthodontic practice can improve patient satisfaction by aligning treatments with esthetic expectations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40641426What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.