Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40641374›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2025

Using Deep Graph Neural Networks Improves Physics-Based Hydration Free Energy Predictions Even for Molecules Outside of the Training Set Distribution.

Luke H Elder, Alexey V Onufriev

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Luke H ElderDepartment of Computer Science, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, United States.ORCID 0009-0005-7978-1608
Alexey V OnufrievDepartment of Computer Science, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4930-6612

Funding

Next generation implicit solvation for atomistic modelingR01GM144596 · NIGMS · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI ONUFRIEV, ALEXEY VLAD · 2022 to 2025
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM144596
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The accuracy of computational water models is crucial to atomistic simulations of biomolecules. Here we explore a decoupled framework that combines classical physics-based models with deep neural networks (DNNs) to correct residual error in hydration free energy (HFE) prediction. Our main goal is to evaluate this framework on out-of-distribution data (molecules that differ significantly from those used in training), where DNNs are known to struggle. Several common physics-based solvation models are used in the evaluation. Graph neural network architectures are tested for their ability to generalize using multiple data set splits, including out-of-distribution HFEs and unseen molecular scaffolds. Our most important finding is that for out-of-distribution data, where DNNs alone often struggle, the physics + DNN models consistently improve physics model predictions. For in-distribution data, the DNN corrections significantly improve the accuracy of physics-based models, with a final RMSE below 1 kcal/mol and a relative improvement between 40% and 65% in most cases. The accuracy of physics + DNN models tends to improve when the 6% of molecules with the highest experimental uncertainty are removed. This study provides insights into the potential and limitations of combining physics and machine learning for molecular modeling, offering a practical and generalizable strategy of using DNN as independent postprocessing correction.

Identifiers

PMID40641374
PMCPMC12302205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.