Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40641238›Full record

ArticlePublic health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)2025

Methodology for a COVID-19 Recovery Surveillance Study Conducted Through an Academic-State Partnership.

Jana L Hirschtick, Yanmei Xie, Blair Whittington, Akash Patel, Michael R Elliott, Kristi Allgood, Joseph Coyle, Nancy L Fleischer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jana L HirschtickAdvocate Health Care, Advocate Aurora Research Institute, Downers Grove, IL, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6532-1372
Yanmei XieDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Blair WhittingtonDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Akash PatelDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Michael R ElliottDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Kristi AllgoodDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Joseph CoyleMichigan Department of Health and Human Services, Lansing, MI, USA.
Nancy L FleischerDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Funding

NCEZID CDC HHS U01 CK000510
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe describe the methodologic approach to rapidly launching a population-based surveillance study in spring 2020 to examine the lasting physical, mental, and economic effect of COVID-19 among adults in Michigan. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe established a partnership between the University of Michigan School of Public Health and the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services to conduct this study. Using a sequential stratified sampling strategy, we randomly selected adults with polymerase chain reaction-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in the Michigan Disease Surveillance System. From 2020 through 2022, respondents completed detailed surveys on the lasting effect of their COVID-19 illness online in English or by telephone in English, Spanish, or Arabic, reflecting the diverse population in Michigan. We created and used sampling weights to reduce survey nonresponse bias and tested the performance of the weights with a nonresponse bias analysis.

resultsOf all sampled people (n = 17 584), 5521 completed our baseline survey a median of 4.5 months after their COVID-19 onset, for a response rate of 32.1%. Most respondents completed the survey online in every region except Detroit, where 67.1% completed the survey by telephone, highlighting the importance of multimode surveys to increase accessibility and generalizability. Our findings suggest minimal nonresponse bias in the weighted baseline sample. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: This unique academic-state partnership resulted in timely and actionable findings related to the lasting effect of COVID-19 that were unavailable elsewhere. While this effort was successful, it was built out of necessity given the limited resources available to local and state health departments to conduct surveillance during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

communicable diseasesepidemiologypublic healthresearch methodssurveillance

Identifiers

PMID40641238
PMCPMC12254136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.