ArticlePhysiological reports2025
Comparative analysis of the ten Tusscher and Tomek human ventricular cell models at cellular, tissue, and organ levels: Implications for post-infarct ventricular tachycardia simulation.
Article in Physiological reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A model of β-adrenergic stimulation in human ventricular cells for tissue-scale simulations of sympathetically modulated tachycardias.The Journal of physiology · 2026Article
- The all-or-none repolarization in cardiac ventricular myocytes: anFrontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Comparative analysis of the ten Tusscher and Tomek human ventricular cell models at cellular, tissue, and organ levels: Implications for post-infarct ventricular tachycardia simulation.Physiological reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Computational modeling is a tool for exploring both normal electrical propagation in healthy hearts and cardiac arrhythmias in patients. While numerous human ventricular cell models exist, the ten Tusscher (TT2) model is one of the most used for simulating ventricular arrhythmia. Recently, the Tomek model has been proposed, offering improved accuracy by better reproducing key depolarization, repolarization, and calcium dynamics in healthy ventricular cardiomyocytes. However, a quantitatively comprehensive comparison of these models at the single-cell, tissue, and organ levels has not been conducted. This study systematically compared the TT2 and Tomek models by evaluating electrophysiological parameters and reentrant properties in 0-dimensional(0D), 1-dimensional(1D), 2-dimensional (2D), and 3-dimensional (3D) simulations. Additionally, the effects of ion currents modifications to simulate ischemic scar-related tissue were analyzed. These results reveal that although the TT2 and Tomek models demonstrate distinct 0D, 1D, and 2D characteristics, their 3D reentrant properties-specifically in terms of reentry locations and critical conduction channels-are highly comparable. Therefore, both models are suitable for simulating post-infarct ventricular tachycardia (VT), as their shared 3D features effectively capture the essential mechanisms underlying this arrhythmia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.