Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40640995›Full record

ArticleThe Medical journal of Australia2025

Australian and New Zealand joint society consensus statement on genetic testing for monogenic diabetes in adults.

Sunita Mc De Sousa, Timothy Me Davis, James Harraway, Mark Greenslade, Kathy Hc Wu, Ryan G Paul, Juliet Taylor, Aleena S Ali, Elif I Ekinci, Rinki Murphy and 1 more

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in The Medical journal of Australia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Treatment Options for Patients with Maturity-Onset Diabetes of the Young (MODY): A Systematic Review of Literature: 2026 Update.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sunita Mc De SousaUniversity of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA.ORCID 0000-0003-0127-6482
Timothy Me DavisUniversity of Western Australia, Perth, WA.ORCID 0000-0003-0749-7411
James HarrawayMater Pathology, Brisbane, QLD.
Mark GreensladeAuckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
Kathy Hc WuClinical Genomics, St Vincent's Health Australia Ltd, Sydney, NSW.
Ryan G PaulWaikato Regional Diabetes Service, Te Whatu Ora Health New Zealand Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Juliet TaylorGenetic Health Service New Zealand, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
Aleena S AliAustin Health, Melbourne, VIC.
Elif I EkinciAustin Health, Melbourne, VIC.
Rinki MurphyUniversity of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Jerry R GreenfieldSt Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW.

Funding

Royal Adelaide Hospital Research Fund
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMonogenic diabetes accounts for 2-5% of diabetes. Although its identification has substantial therapeutic implications, more than 80% of affected individuals are undiagnosed or misdiagnosed as having type 1 or 2 diabetes. This consensus statement reviews genetic testing for monogenic diabetes in adults and provides evidence-based recommendations. With representation from the Australian Diabetes Society (ADS), Endocrine Society of Australia (ESA), Human Genetics Society of Australasia (HGSA), New Zealand Society for the Study of Diabetes (NZSSD) and Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia (RCPA), the writing group: (i) defined questions to be addressed, (ii) conducted critical literature reviews, (iii) graded the evidence, and (iv) generated recommendations that were refined until consensus was achieved. All contemporary literature was considered, with a focus on Australian and New Zealand data, where available. MAIN RECOMMENDATIONS: Indications for genetic testing for monogenic diabetes in adults include: (i) diabetes onset before 12 months of age, (ii) glucokinase (GCK)-hyperglycaemia phenotype, (iii) diabetes onset before 30 years of age without markers of type 1 or 2 diabetes, (iv) syndromic monogenic diabetes phenotype, or (v) high probability of monogenic diabetes using validated screening tools. Individuals undergoing genetic testing should be provided with comprehensive pre- and post-test counselling. Genetic testing typically involves next-generation sequencing, and should include classically syndromic genetic variants (eg, m.3243A>G, HNF1B variants) even in individuals with isolated diabetes. A molecular diagnosis facilitates gene-specific treatment, surveillance, reproductive planning and cascade testing of relatives. In pregnancies of individuals with GCK-hyperglycaemia, maternal treatment can be individualised to known or assumed fetal genotype. Individuals with monogenic diabetes variants of uncertain significance or negative results may be considered for further phenotype or genotype assessment and recruitment into research studies. CHANGES IN MANAGEMENT: This consensus statement aims to raise awareness of monogenic diabetes among clinicians involved in the care of patients with diabetes, and to improve genetic testing rates across Australia and New Zealand.

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Genetic TestingAdultAustraliaHumansNew ZealandSocieties, MedicalDiabetesGenetic counselingGenetic testingmaturity‐onset

Identifiers

PMID40640995
PMCPMC12579922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.