Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40640990›Full record

Observational studyInternational wound journal2025

Assessment of Hard-To-Heal Lower Leg Wounds With Near-Infrared Fluorescent Imaging: A Pilot Cohort Study.

Kari A Clifford, Emil Schmidt, Jan Johnstone, Jolanta Krysa

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International wound journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kari A CliffordDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Otago Medical School, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4908-7413
Emil SchmidtHealth New Zealand, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Jan JohnstoneHealth New Zealand, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Jolanta KrysaDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Otago Medical School, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

Funding

Fisher and Paykel Healthcare
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This case series explores the application of Near-infrared fluorescent (NIRF) imaging as a diagnostic tool for assessing hard-to-heal wounds. Our aim was to explore the potential of this modality to provide insights into wound perfusion, tissue viability and healing progress. We conducted a 12-week non-randomised observational study, a subset of an ongoing interventional study. Participants with hard-to-heal lower limb wounds received multi-disciplinary wound care. NIRF imaging using Indocyanine green contrast was performed prior to treatment, at six and 12 weeks. Visual assessment and quantitative analysis of fluorescent intensity within a region of interest were summarised. Seventeen participants were included, with a mean (SD) age of 64 (9) years. Forty-seven percent were diabetic and 45% had peripheral arterial disease. Wound size changes ranged from 23% to -95%. Changes in wound healing in patients whose intensity reduced had better observed effects (i.e., reduction in area and increase in granulation). Increasing intensity was observed in three patients requiring further treatment for pathology not visually observable. NIRF imaging allows visualisation of revascularisation and wound healing progress prior to observable changes in hard-to-heal wounds, providing insight into inflammation that may otherwise go unnoticed. Further research is needed to determine the utility of NIRF in wound management.

Indexed as

Leg UlcerLower ExtremityOptical ImagingWound HealingAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleHumansIndocyanine GreenMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsSpectroscopy, Near-InfraredIndocyanine Greenhard‐to‐heal woundsnear infrared imagingwound care

Identifiers

PMID40640990
PMCPMC12245618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.