Observational studyInternational wound journal2025
Assessment of Hard-To-Heal Lower Leg Wounds With Near-Infrared Fluorescent Imaging: A Pilot Cohort Study.
Observational study in International wound journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessment of Hard-To-Heal Lower Leg Wounds With Near-Infrared Fluorescent Imaging: A Pilot Cohort Study.International wound journal · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This case series explores the application of Near-infrared fluorescent (NIRF) imaging as a diagnostic tool for assessing hard-to-heal wounds. Our aim was to explore the potential of this modality to provide insights into wound perfusion, tissue viability and healing progress. We conducted a 12-week non-randomised observational study, a subset of an ongoing interventional study. Participants with hard-to-heal lower limb wounds received multi-disciplinary wound care. NIRF imaging using Indocyanine green contrast was performed prior to treatment, at six and 12 weeks. Visual assessment and quantitative analysis of fluorescent intensity within a region of interest were summarised. Seventeen participants were included, with a mean (SD) age of 64 (9) years. Forty-seven percent were diabetic and 45% had peripheral arterial disease. Wound size changes ranged from 23% to -95%. Changes in wound healing in patients whose intensity reduced had better observed effects (i.e., reduction in area and increase in granulation). Increasing intensity was observed in three patients requiring further treatment for pathology not visually observable. NIRF imaging allows visualisation of revascularisation and wound healing progress prior to observable changes in hard-to-heal wounds, providing insight into inflammation that may otherwise go unnoticed. Further research is needed to determine the utility of NIRF in wound management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.