Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40640987›Full record

ArticleAnatomical sciences education2025

Enhancing anatomical education: Developing and evaluating ultrasound training for anatomists.

Siphelele Khanyile, Johanna Maria de Lange, Daniël J van Hoving, Karin Baatjes, Heinri Zaayman, Janine C Correia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anatomical sciences education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Siphelele KhanyileDivision of Clinical Anatomy, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3077-2525
Johanna Maria de LangeDivision of Clinical Anatomy, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8313-7990
Daniël J van HovingDivision of Emergency Medicine, Department of Family and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4300-0372
Karin BaatjesDivision of Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8432-8844
Heinri ZaaymanDivision of Emergency Medicine, Department of Family and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7639-7030
Janine C CorreiaDivision of Clinical Anatomy, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3964-9889

Funding

Stellenbosch University Undergraduate and Honours Research Fund
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultrasound is a useful diagnostic tool that can yield significant diagnostic data, but its optimized usage necessitates operators who are trained and experienced. Integrating ultrasound into anatomy education has been demonstrated to significantly enhance medical and health science students' understanding of living anatomy by providing real-time, dynamic visualizations of anatomical structures. This study aimed to develop, implement, and evaluate a comprehensive program for anatomists, with a focus on enhancing training in ultrasound techniques and fostering motivation to integrate ultrasound into their teaching methodologies for effective anatomical instruction. This qualitative case study was conducted with thirteen lecturers and MSc Anatomy students at the Division of Clinical Anatomy, Stellenbosch University, after obtaining written informed consent prior to participation. The study employed a convenient sampling strategy, ensuring that all participants were willing and interested in the ultrasound training session. Participants received preparatory videos before engaging in practical training. The session involved a brief theoretical introduction followed by 90 min of hands-on practice, where participants scanned anatomical structures under guidance. Out of the 13 participants, ten completed the open-ended questionnaires. Thematic analysis of the data developed two themes. These are described as: (1) Strengths of Ultrasound Training; and (2) Challenges and Strategies for Improvement in Ultrasound Training. The training effectively engaged participants and highlighted areas for improvement to enhance the educational impact. The study was conducted at a single institutional setting, and as a result, the findings may have limited transferability to other institutions with different teaching methods and resources.

Indexed as

AnatomistsAnatomyEducation, Medical, UndergraduateAdultCurriculumFemaleHumansMaleProgram EvaluationQualitative ResearchStudents, MedicalSurveys and QuestionnairesTeachingUltrasonographyanatomy educationproficiency enhancementqualitative case studyultrasound training

Identifiers

PMID40640987
PMCPMC12592904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.