ArticleAnatomical sciences education2025
Enhancing anatomical education: Developing and evaluating ultrasound training for anatomists.
Article in Anatomical sciences education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Enhancing anatomical education: Developing and evaluating ultrasound training for anatomists.Anatomical sciences education · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ultrasound is a useful diagnostic tool that can yield significant diagnostic data, but its optimized usage necessitates operators who are trained and experienced. Integrating ultrasound into anatomy education has been demonstrated to significantly enhance medical and health science students' understanding of living anatomy by providing real-time, dynamic visualizations of anatomical structures. This study aimed to develop, implement, and evaluate a comprehensive program for anatomists, with a focus on enhancing training in ultrasound techniques and fostering motivation to integrate ultrasound into their teaching methodologies for effective anatomical instruction. This qualitative case study was conducted with thirteen lecturers and MSc Anatomy students at the Division of Clinical Anatomy, Stellenbosch University, after obtaining written informed consent prior to participation. The study employed a convenient sampling strategy, ensuring that all participants were willing and interested in the ultrasound training session. Participants received preparatory videos before engaging in practical training. The session involved a brief theoretical introduction followed by 90 min of hands-on practice, where participants scanned anatomical structures under guidance. Out of the 13 participants, ten completed the open-ended questionnaires. Thematic analysis of the data developed two themes. These are described as: (1) Strengths of Ultrasound Training; and (2) Challenges and Strategies for Improvement in Ultrasound Training. The training effectively engaged participants and highlighted areas for improvement to enhance the educational impact. The study was conducted at a single institutional setting, and as a result, the findings may have limited transferability to other institutions with different teaching methods and resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.