Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40640967›Full record

SynthesisEnvironmental evidence2025

The impact of aminoglycoside exposure on soil and plant root-associated microbiota: a meta-analysis.

Jessica L Coates, Ashanti J Lawson, Kathleen Bostick, Mentewab Ayalew

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Environmental evidence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jessica L CoatesBiology Department, Spelman College, 350 Spelman Lane, Atlanta, GA, 30314, USA.
Ashanti J LawsonBiology Department, Spelman College, 350 Spelman Lane, Atlanta, GA, 30314, USA.
Kathleen BostickBiology Department, Spelman College, 350 Spelman Lane, Atlanta, GA, 30314, USA.
Mentewab AyalewBiology Department, Spelman College, 350 Spelman Lane, Atlanta, GA, 30314, USA. mayalew@spelman.edu.

Funding

Directorate for Biological Sciences 2000157Division of Computing and Communication Foundations 1761945
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExposure to aminoglycosides, a class of potent bactericidal antibiotics naturally produced by soil microorganisms and commonly used in agriculture, has the potential to cause shifts in the population dynamics of microorganisms that impact plant and soil health. In particular, aminoglycoside exposure could result in alterations of the soil and plant root-associated bacterial species diversity and richness due to their potent inhibitory action on microbial growth, the creation of selective conditions for the proliferation of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, or a reduction in the ability to suppress soil pathogens. Previous studies have attempted to understand the relationship between aminoglycoside exposure and the plant-associated microbiota with varying results. Thus, this systematic review aims to survey all relevant published data to answer the question, "What is the impact of aminoglycoside exposure on the soil and plant root-associated microbiota?"

methodsWe searched 5 academic databases and 1 specialist organization database for scientific journal publications written in any language. Articles were included based on the criteria described in Coates et al., 2022. Included studies were subject to critical appraisal using the CEE Critical Appraisal Tool Version 0.2 (Prototype) to evaluate their susceptibility to confounding factors, misclassification bias, selection bias, attrition bias, reporting bias and analysis bias. Studies deemed to be high risk based on critical appraisal results were excluded from further analysis. Descriptive data analysis was performed for studies considered low or unclear for risk of bias. Meta-analyses were conducted for antibiotic resistance and microbial diversity. REVIEW

findingsOut of 8370 screened records, 50 articles fulfilled the search criteria, and from these, 13 studies were included in meta-analysis. Most studies investigated the impact of aminoglycoside exposure on soil microbiota (93%) in a laboratory setting (62%), primarily from the United States (32%), China (24%), France, Switzerland and Germany (8%). A limited number of studies investigated the impact of aminoglycoside exposure on disease suppression, so it was excluded from meta-analysis. Therefore, our synthesis primarily details the impact of aminoglycoside exposure on the microbial diversity and antibiotic resistance of the soil microbiota. Overall, exposure to aminoglycosides did not result in a significant change in the microbial diversity. However, soil use, pH, and type of aminoglycoside used could be potential modifiers. Additionally, we observed an average 7% of the microbial population exhibiting resistance to aminoglycosides, with the relationship between the exposure concentration and the selection concentration emerging as a potential modifier.

conclusionsCurrent research is limited by gaps in understanding the relationship between aminoglycoside exposure, microbial community dynamics, and disease suppression, as well as by insufficient data on less-studied aminoglycosides and key confounding factors. Current research also suggests a potential relationship between antibiotic concentrations used for exposure and selection of resistant bacteria. These findings emphasize the need for informed antibiotic management policies and rigorous, targeted research to better understand the relationship between soil factors and antibiotic concentrations used on the impact of aminoglycosides on soil microbiota.

Indexed as

Microbial compositionPathogen suppressionPlant root microbiotaResistome

Identifiers

PMID40640967
PMCPMC12243174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.