Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40640960›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2025

Family-related adversity and positive youth development: the role of psychological distress, hopelessness and hostility.

Jaroslava Mackova, Zuzana Dankulincova Veselska, Daniela Filakovska Bobakova, Andrea Madarasova Geckova, Jitse P van Dijk, Sijmen A Reijneveld

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jaroslava MackovaDepartment of Health Psychology and Research Methodology, Faculty of Medicine, PJ Safarik University, Trieda SNP 1, Kosice, 040 01, Slovak Republic.
Zuzana Dankulincova VeselskaDepartment of Health Psychology and Research Methodology, Faculty of Medicine, PJ Safarik University, Trieda SNP 1, Kosice, 040 01, Slovak Republic. zuzana.dankulincova@upjs.sk.
Daniela Filakovska BobakovaDepartment of Health Psychology and Research Methodology, Faculty of Medicine, PJ Safarik University, Trieda SNP 1, Kosice, 040 01, Slovak Republic.
Andrea Madarasova GeckovaDepartment of Health Psychology and Research Methodology, Faculty of Medicine, PJ Safarik University, Trieda SNP 1, Kosice, 040 01, Slovak Republic.
Jitse P van DijkOlomouc University Social Health Institute, Palacky University in Olomouc, Univerzitni 22, Olomouc, 771 11, Czech Republic.
Sijmen A ReijneveldDepartment of Community & Occupational Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, Groningen, 9713 AV, the Netherlands.

Funding

Agentúra na Podporu Výskumu a Vývoja APVV-15-0012Scientific Grant Agency of the Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Sport of the Slovak Republic and the Slovak Academy of Sciences 1/0177/20
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe family is a very important institution that provides relationships and contexts for adolescents and can activate a trajectory of their positive development. Family-related adversity can endanger this development via associated negative emotions, such as feelings of hopelessness, hostility, and psychological distress. Therefore, we aimed first to explore the association of family-related adversity with positive youth development (PYD), and second whether psychological distress, hopelessness, and hostility mediate this association.

methodsWe obtained self-reported data from 308 Slovak adolescents (44.5% were boys, mean age = 12.55). Family-related adversity was measured using questions regarding the death of parents, divorce/separation, violence between parents, and parental substance abuse. Positive youth development was measured with the Very Short PYD questionnaire; psychological distress with the GHQ-12; hopelessness with the Hopelessness questionnaire and hostility with a subscale from the Aggression Questionnaire.

resultsWe found that family-related adversity was not associated with the first PYD component – internal values (regarding the domains of character and caring). However, it was negatively associated with its second component – self- and social efficacy (regarding the domains connection, competence and confidence): regression coefficient B= -0.32; 95%; confidence interval CI: -0.57 to -0.06). Next, we found that psychological distress (0.38; -0.50 to -0.26), hopelessness (-0.18; -0.31 to -0.05) and hostility (-0.23; -0.33 to -0.13) were associated with self- and social efficacy. Moreover, all potential mediators had statistically significant indirect effects: psychological distress − 0.11, hopelessness − 0.09 and hostility − 0.08.

conclusionThese findings may provide suggestions for programs supporting adolescents from families in adversity. These could be directed at better coping with psychological distress and addressing hostility and hopelessness.

Indexed as

Adolescent DevelopmentHostilityPsychological DistressStress, PsychologicalAdolescentChildFemaleHumansMaleSlovakiaFamily-related adversityHopelessnessHostilityPositive youth developmentPsychological distress

Identifiers

PMID40640960
PMCPMC12247354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.