ArticleScandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine2025
Human and animal models for studying hemorrhagic shock.
Article in Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- From molecular networks to precision therapeutics: the evolving landscape of trauma-induced coagulopathy.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2026Review
- Cytoprotection as a Unifying Strategy for Hemorrhage and Thrombosis: The Role of BPC 157 and Related Therapeutics.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A model to simulate cardio-respiratory responses to fentanyl analgesia after traumatic injury.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStudying the physiological response to severe hemorrhage remains challenging in real-world patients. Animal and human models mitigate some of the challenges by facilitating controlled studies on hemorrhagic shock. Here, we comment on existing and future hemorrhagic shock models. MODELS FOR STUDYING HEMORRHAGIC SHOCK: While small animal models are cost-effective and suited for proof-of-concept studies, large animal models provide better translational relevance as they are physiologically and anatomically more comparable to humans. Experimental models in healthy volunteers- and specifically the lower body negative pressure model- offer a human model to study early hemodynamic responses to simulated hemorrhage, though limited in severity and lack of tissue injury.
conclusionsAnimal and human models are valuable in studying the physiological response to hemorrhage. Acknowledging their respective limitations, a triangulated approach can enhance our overall understanding of hemorrhagic shock. In the future, we expect artificial intelligence, machine learning and computer-based simulation models to complement existing research models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.