Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40640789›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2025

Attention-based multimodal deep learning for interpretable and generalizable prediction of pathological complete response in breast cancer.

Taishi Nishizawa, Takouhie Maldjian, Zhicheng Jiao, Tim Q Duong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Multimodal Wearable Biosensing Meets Multidomain AI: A Pathway to Decentralized Healthcare.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. [Artificial intelligence in predicting pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: current advances and challenges].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Taishi NishizawaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Takouhie MaldjianDepartment of Radiology, Montefiore Health System and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Zhicheng Jiao *Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA. zhicheng_jiao@brown.edu.
Tim Q Duong *Department of Radiology, Montefiore Health System and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA. tim.duong@einsteinmed.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6403-2827

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate prediction of pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy has significant clinical utility in the management of breast cancer treatment. Although multimodal deep learning models have shown promise for predicting pCR from medical imaging and other clinical data, their adoption has been limited due to challenges with interpretability and generalizability across institutions.

methodsWe developed a multimodal deep learning model combining post contrast-enhanced whole-breast MRI at pre- and post-treatment timepoints with non-imaging clinical features. The model integrates 3D convolutional neural networks and self-attention to capture spatial and cross-modal interactions. We utilized two public multi-institutional datasets to perform internal and external validation of the model. For model training and validation, we used data from the I-SPY 2 trial (N = 660). For external validation, we used the I-SPY 1 dataset (N = 114).

resultsOf the 660 patients in I-SPY 2, 217 patients achieved pCR (32.88%). Of the 114 patients in I-SPY 1, 29 achieved pCR (25.44%). The attention-based multimodal model yielded the best predictive performance with an AUC of 0.73 ± 0.04 on the internal data and an AUC of 0.71 ± 0.02 on the external dataset. The MRI-only model (internal AUC = 0.68 ± 0.03, external AUC = 0.70 ± 0.04) and the non-MRI clinical features-only model (internal AUC = 0.66 ± 0.08, external AUC = 0.71 ± 0.03) trailed in performance, indicating the combination of both modalities is most effective.

conclusionWe present a robust and interpretable deep learning framework for pCR prediction in breast cancer patients undergoing NAC. By combining imaging and clinical data with attention-based fusion, the model achieves strong predictive performance and generalizes across institutions.

Indexed as

AttentionBreast NeoplasmsDeep LearningAdultFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsTreatment Outcome3D ResNetArtificial intelligenceCNNDynamic contrast enhanced MRIHormonal receptorHuman epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)Magnetic resonance imagingMolecular subtypesProgression free survivalTriple negative

Identifiers

PMID40640789
PMCPMC12247266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.