ArticleBMC psychiatry2025
Effectiveness of suicide prevention gatekeeper training in nurses at a tertiary health care center in Nepal.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Building a culture of suicide prevention and care: Implementation of an evidence-based guideline of the Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario in a Chilean occupational hospital.International journal of nursing sciences · 2026Article
- Suicide prevention in primary health care among socially vulnerable populations: a narrative review.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Exploring multilevel determinants of nursing documentation quality in suicide care: A qualitative Study in Iranian hospitals.PloS one · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the community-based suicide surveillance system in Northern Thailand using the RE-AIM framework.BMC public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSuicide constitutes a significant public health concern in Nepal, characterized by a lack of comprehensive national preventive strategies and insufficient training for healthcare workers in assessing mental illness and suicidal behaviors. Nurses, as frontline healthcare providers, play a critical role in identifying patients at risk. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of a suicide gatekeeper training program for nurses, with a focus on improving self-efficacy and attitudes toward suicide prevention.
methodsA single-group pretest-posttest study recruited 72 nurses from various clinical units of a tertiary care center. The intervention model consisted of a 2-hour suicide prevention gatekeeper training program developed at the same center. The program's effectiveness was measured using gatekeeper self-efficacy and attitudes toward suicide scale prior to and one week after the training. A paired sample t-test was performed to compare the pretest and post-test results.
resultsSignificant improvements were observed in both self-efficacy (d = 1.12) and attitudes (d = 0.05) after the training. While self-efficacy showed a large effect size, indicating substantial gains in confidence, attitude change was minimal. Significant differences were found across age groups and years of experience, with all groups showing improvements in self-efficacy and attitudes (p < 0.05 to p < 0.001). The median scores for all items of the self-efficacy tool showed a substantial rise from pretest to posttest.
conclusionThe suicide prevention gatekeeper training program significantly improved nurses' self-efficacy and attitudes toward suicide prevention, enhancing their ability to identify and manage suicide risks. However, the smaller effect on attitude change suggests that additional interventions may be needed for more substantial attitudinal shifts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.