ArticleBMC women's health2025
Examination of body image perception and quality of life of women with segmental or total mastectomy: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBreast cancer is the most common type of cancer in women, and it has severe effects on quality and duration of life. The aim of this study was to examine the body image perception and quality of life of women who underwent segmental or total mastectomy.
methodsThe study was conducted in a city hospital in southern Turkey and included 170 participants. Data were collected using a patient identification form, a breast cancer body image scale, and a breast cancer specific quality of life scale (versions C30 and BR23). SPSS v.25.0 was used in the analysis. The study adhered to the Strengthening Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines.
resultsWhile there was a negative relationship between women’s general health (such as pain, nausea, vomiting, and fatigue) (p < 0.001, r=-0.503) and social function (such as maintaining family life, engaging in social activities, and financial difficulties) (p < 0.001, r=-0.487) and their body image perceptions, there was a positive relationship between increased body functions (such as walking, carrying, and bathing) and their body image perceptions. This study showed that mastectomy type was associated with body image perception (p < 0.001. η²=0.105) and general health (p < 0.001, η²=0.121). Both have a moderate effect size according to the eta squared coefficient.
conclusionIn this study, women who had undergone total mastectomy had a more negative body image perception than those who had undergone segmental mastectomy. Women who underwent segmental mastectomy had better general health status and higher quality of life and functioning levels. Current data have indicates that body image perception has a direct relationship with general health and quality of life. The results of this study highlight the importance of developing personalised care plans and providing psychosocial support to women after mastectomy. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.