Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40640748›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025

Prevalence and correlates of physical violence perpetrated by an intimate partner against women who are pregnant in India.

Harish Kalra, Thach Tran, Hau Nguyen, Prabha Chandra, Helen Sharp, Jane Fisher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Harish KalraSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. harish.kalra@monash.edu.
Thach TranSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Hau NguyenSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Prabha ChandraDepartment of Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, India.
Helen SharpDepartment of Primary care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, England.
Jane FisherSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntimate partner violence (IPV) against women is a public health concern and a human rights violation. Women in low- and middle-income countries such as India experience higher rates of violence than in high-income countries. Experiencing IPV during pregnancy is associated with worse maternal, foetal and child outcomes. There is relatively limited representative population-based data on the burden and related factors of IPV experienced by women during pregnancy in India. This study aimed to ascertain the prevalence of experiences of physical IPV during pregnancy and the factors associated with it in India.

methodsThis is a secondary analysis of data collected in the Fifth Indian National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5). The primary outcome was lifetime experience of physical violence during pregnancy perpetrated by a former and/or current partner. The relationship between this outcome and sociodemographic, relationship, societal and gender-based factors characteristics were examined. Data were analysed using multivariable logistic regression.

resultsAmong 60,579 women who had ever been married or in a union and ever been pregnant, the lifetime prevalence of physical IPV during pregnancy was 2.4%. Experience of physical violence during pregnancy was significantly more common among women experiencing diverse social and economic disadvantages such as low household wealth, being a member of a scheduled caste, or a religious minority. Women whose partners had lower educational status or who drank alcohol had higher odds of experiencing IPV during pregnancy. It was less common among women who were more empowered including having more decision-making autonomy.

conclusionDespite low prevalence, the absolute numbers of women experiencing physical IPV during pregnancy in India are alarmingly high. There is an urgent need to screen and provide early interventions for IPV during pregnancy in India. Further research is needed to identify the prevalence of other forms of intimate partner violence including sexual and emotional abuse, financial abuse and coercive control experienced by women who are pregnant in India.

Indexed as

Intimate Partner ViolencePhysical AbusePregnant PeopleSpouse AbuseAdolescentAdultFemaleHealth SurveysHumansIndiaLogistic ModelsPregnancyPrevalenceRisk FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40640748
PMCPMC12243293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.