Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40640734›Full record

ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2025

Comparison of oscillometry with lung function parameters between patients with stable bronchial asthma with airflow obstruction and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Sajal De, Aakansha Ashok Sarda

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sajal DeDepartment of Pulmonary Critical Care & Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, 492099, India. sajalde@yahoo.com.
Aakansha Ashok SardaDepartment of Pulmonary Critical Care & Sleep Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, 492099, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLung oscillometry is an emerging investigation for assessing patients with obstructive airway disease. Comparison of oscillometry parameters with bronchodilator responsiveness (BDR) between patients with bronchial asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with comparable severity of airflow obstruction has not been previously investigated. This study aimed to compare oscillometry parameters and bronchodilator responsiveness with other lung function parameters between stable bronchial asthma patients with airflow obstruction and COPD patients with a similar severity of airflow obstruction.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed the data of 467 consecutive adults with clinical diagnoses of bronchial asthma (n = 187) and COPD (n = 280). Oscillometry, spirometry, and body plethysmography were performed before and after inhalation of 400 µg of salbutamol. The patients were stratified based on the severity of airflow obstruction on spirometry. The z-scores of oscillometric parameters were used for comparison.

resultsThe average age of the study population was 54.9 years, and 76.4% of the participants were male. Patients with COPD were older, had a higher proportion of smokers, and poorer lung function. The oscillometry parameters showed progressive impairment with increasing severity of airflow obstruction, irrespective of the underlying disease. Patients with bronchial asthma, particularly those with moderate to severe airway obstruction, demonstrated significantly greater R5 and R19 than patients with COPD. The within- and whole-breath X5 of bronchial asthma patients were not different from those of COPD patients with similar severity of airflow obstruction. Expiratory flow limitation at tidal breaths (ΔX5 > 0.28 kPa/L/s) was observed in both bronchial asthma and COPD patients across all severities of airflow obstruction. The proportion of BDR on oscillometry was significantly lower than that on spirometry for both bronchial asthma (35.3% vs. 57.1%; p < 0.01) and COPD patients (19.3% vs. 47.1%; p = 0.02). BDR in spirometry and BDR in oscillometry showed fair agreement for bronchial asthma and a slight agreement for COPD patients.

conclusionsExcept for respiratory resistance, oscillometry parameters did not differ significantly between patients with bronchial asthma and those with COPD of similar severity of airflow obstruction. COPD patients exhibited a lower BDR in both spirometry and oscillometry than those with bronchial asthma.

Indexed as

AsthmaOscillometryPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAdultAgedAirway ObstructionAlbuterolBronchodilator AgentsFemaleForced Expiratory VolumeHumansMaleMiddle AgedPlethysmography, Whole BodyRespiratory Function TestsRetrospective StudiesAlbuterolBronchodilator AgentsBronchial asthmaBronchodilator responsivenessCOPDLung oscillometryRespiratory reactanceRespiratory resistanceSpirometry

Identifiers

PMID40640734
PMCPMC12243130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.