Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40640710›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2025

Rprot-Vec: a deep learning approach for fast protein structure similarity calculation.

Yichuan Zhang, Wen Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yichuan ZhangDepartment of Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Wen ZhangCharles E. Schmidt College of Science, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, 33431, USA. zhang.wen81@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPredicting protein structural similarity and detecting homologous sequences remain fundamental and challenging tasks in computational biology. Accurate identification of structural homologs enables function inference for newly discovered or unannotated proteins. Traditional approaches often require full 3D structural data, which is unavailable for most proteins. Thus, there is a need for sequence-based methods capable of inferring structural similarity efficiently and at scale.

resultWe present Rprot-Vec (Rapid Protein Vector), a deep learning model that predicts protein structural similarity and performs homology detection using only primary sequence data. The model integrates bidirectional GRU and multi-scale CNN layers with ProtT5-based encoding, enabling accurate and fast similarity estimation. Rprot-Vec achieves a 65.3% accurate similarity prediction rate in the homologous region (TM-score > 0.8), with an average prediction error of 0.0561 across all TM-score intervals. Despite having only 41% of the parameters of TM-vec, Rprot-Vec outperforms both public and locally trained TM-vec baselines in all tested settings. Additionally, we constructed and released three curated training datasets (CATH_TM_score_S/M/L), supporting further research in this area.

conclusionRprot-Vec offers a fast and lightweight solution for sequence-based structural similarity prediction. It can be applied in protein homology detection, structure-function inference, drug repurposing, and other downstream biological tasks. Its open-source availability and released datasets facilitate broader adoption and further development by the research community.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyDeep LearningProteinsDatabases, ProteinProtein ConformationSequence Analysis, ProteinSoftwareProteinsBi-GRUCNNDeep learningHomology detectionProtein sequence encodingProtein structure similarityRprot-VecTM-score prediction

Identifiers

PMID40640710
PMCPMC12243341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.