ArticleBMC medical imaging2025
FF Swin-Unet: a strategy for automated segmentation and severity scoring of NAFLD.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A human-AI collaborative workflow for improved gross tumor volume delineation in esophageal cancer radiotherapy.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Unified multimodal learning for stroke triage: joint detection, scoring, and segmentation of acute ischemic stroke.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- AI-driven diagnostic and prognostic models for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: insights from clinical, imaging, and multi-omics studies-a scoping review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNon-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a significant risk factor for liver cancer and cardiovascular diseases, imposing substantial social and economic burdens. Computed tomography (CT) scans are crucial for diagnosing NAFLD and assessing its severity. However, current manual measurement techniques require considerable human effort and resources from radiologists, and there is a lack of standardized methods for classifying the severity of NAFLD in existing research.
methodsTo address these challenges, we propose a novel method for NAFLD segmentation and automated severity scoring. The method consists of three key modules: (1) The Semi-automatization nnU-Net Module (SNM) constructs a high-quality dataset by combining manual annotations with semi-automated refinement; (2) The Focal Feature Fusion Swin-Unet Module (FSM) enhances liver and spleen segmentation through multi-scale feature fusion and Swin Transformer-based architectures; (3) The Automated Severity Scoring Module (ASSM) integrates segmentation results with radiological features to classify NAFLD severity. These modules are embedded in a Flask-RESTful API-based system, enabling users to upload abdominal CT data for automated preprocessing, segmentation, and scoring.
resultsThe Focal Feature Fusion Swin-Unet (FF Swin-Unet) method significantly improves segmentation accuracy, achieving a Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 95.64% and a 95th percentile Hausdorff distance (HD95) of 15.94. The accuracy of the automated severity scoring is 90%. With model compression and ONNX deployment, the evaluation speed for each case is approximately 5 seconds. Compared to manual diagnosis, the system can process a large volume of data simultaneously, rapidly, and efficiently while maintaining the same level of diagnostic accuracy, significantly reducing the workload of medical professionals.
conclusionsOur research demonstrates that the proposed system has high accuracy in processing large volumes of CT data and providing automated NAFLD severity scores quickly and efficiently. This method has the potential to significantly reduce the workload of medical professionals and holds immense clinical application potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.