ReviewAcademic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry2026
Use of Virtual Patients and Related Training Outcomes in Postgraduate Psychiatry Residency Education: A Scoping Review.
Review in Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveVirtual patients (VP) such as high-fidelity patient simulators/manikins, VP avatars, or human simulated patients have been increasingly used in health professions and psychiatry residency education. The authors aimed to review extant literature and summarize the different types of VP adopted, training contexts, and its impact according to the Kirkpatrick model for evaluation of training outcomes.
methodsThe authors adopted the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for evidence synthesis and used a five-step framework, searching several databases (MEDLINE, Web of Science, PsycInfo, PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane) for pertinent articles published up to August 2024. Studies were included if they (1) were empirical studies involving use of VP in psychiatry residency training, (2) with evaluation of training outcomes, and (3) were published in English.
resultsOverall, 31 articles met the inclusion criteria. Among studies that were mostly conducted in the West, human simulated patients were most used, followed by VP avatar and high-fidelity simulators/manikins. Most studies across specific topics (ranging from anxiety to psychotic and alcohol use disorders) reported outcomes up to level 3 of the Kirkpatrick model. Apart from user acceptability, other training outcomes included improvements in knowledge about the topics covered, clinical care competency related to history taking, risk assessment, use of psychotropic medications, and neurostimulation treatment.
conclusionsFuture studies may consider multi-site collaborations to examine the impact of such VP interventions in different psychiatry residency training environments, compare across different VP modalities, include assessments at higher Kirkpatrick levels of training outcomes, and monitor longitudinal changes in learner outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40640697What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.