ArticleSurgical endoscopy2025
Application of 5G robotic telesurgery in urology: a multicenter study in the real world.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Remote robotic urological surgery with the Toumai® System across 25-7,000 km: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis of technical success and reported safety.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Tele-robot-assisted prostatectomy: the first systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Remote robot-assisted renal surgery: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis of real-world evidence.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Safety and feasibility of robotic telesurgery in urological procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical data.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Global research trends and hotspots of robot-assisted urological telesurgery: a bibliometric analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Robotic partial nephrectomy is inching toward the gold standard for small renal masses-a narrative review.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Review
- Urological telesurgery after the first randomised trial: a scoping review and public implementation visibility audit.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe current literature still lacks robust real-life evidence to support the practical implications of telesurgery. We conduct the current study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of telesurgery over a high-speed remote communication network (the 5G network) in the real world.
methodsA total of 37 patients were enrolled across the participating hospitals from December 2023 to June 2024. Patients underwent various telesurgeries including radical prostatectomy, partial nephrectomy and other urological surgeries. The primary end point is the success rate of remote surgery. The secondary end points include network transmission status, robot-assisted surgery time, intraoperative blood loss, subjective evaluation of intraoperative experience, postoperative PSA level, positive surgical margin. Other evaluation index includes the surgeon's physiological and psychological stress during surgery, equipment failure and adverse events as postoperative complications.
resultsThe overall success rate for remote surgery was 100% [95% confidence interval (CI) 90.5-100, p = 0.019]. The mean network signal delay was 55.30 ± 39.64 ms. The total delay at the local and remote ends were 250.30 ± 39.64 ms and 249.78 ± 40.00 ms, respectively. The average packet loss rate was less than 0.01% at both ends. The evaluation of the remote surgeons' intraoperative experience excellent. A total of 6 adverse events occurred and none were related to the instruments of robot. No postoperative complications of Clavien-Dindo grade III-IV occurred. No serious or repairable equipment failure occurred at either the remote or local end.
conclusionsIt is feasible to perform urological telesurgery over the 5G high-speed remote communication network to overcome geographical barriers and improve patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40640627What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.