Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40640627›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2025

Application of 5G robotic telesurgery in urology: a multicenter study in the real world.

Shicheng Yu, Jin Tao, Bohong Guo, Zhiqiang Chen, Bojun Chen, Shengzheng Wang, Xiaofeng Zhang, Xuepei Zhang, Fenghai Zhou, Guoqing Ding

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Shicheng Yu *Department of Urology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Jin Tao *Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhouu, People's Republic of China.
Bohong Guo *Department of Urology, Gansu Provincial People's Hospital, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China.
Zhiqiang ChenDepartment of Urology, Alaer Hospital of the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, Xinjiang, People's Republic of China.
Bojun ChenDepartment of Urology, The First People's Hospital of Wenling, Wenling, People's Republic of China.
Shengzheng WangDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhouu, People's Republic of China.
Xiaofeng ZhangDepartment of Urology, Gansu Provincial People's Hospital, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China.
Xuepei ZhangDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhouu, People's Republic of China. zhangxuepei@263.net.
Fenghai ZhouDepartment of Urology, Gansu Provincial People's Hospital, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China. zhoufengh@163.com.
Guoqing DingDepartment of Urology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China. 3196014@zju.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe current literature still lacks robust real-life evidence to support the practical implications of telesurgery. We conduct the current study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of telesurgery over a high-speed remote communication network (the 5G network) in the real world.

methodsA total of 37 patients were enrolled across the participating hospitals from December 2023 to June 2024. Patients underwent various telesurgeries including radical prostatectomy, partial nephrectomy and other urological surgeries. The primary end point is the success rate of remote surgery. The secondary end points include network transmission status, robot-assisted surgery time, intraoperative blood loss, subjective evaluation of intraoperative experience, postoperative PSA level, positive surgical margin. Other evaluation index includes the surgeon's physiological and psychological stress during surgery, equipment failure and adverse events as postoperative complications.

resultsThe overall success rate for remote surgery was 100% [95% confidence interval (CI) 90.5-100, p = 0.019]. The mean network signal delay was 55.30 ± 39.64 ms. The total delay at the local and remote ends were 250.30 ± 39.64 ms and 249.78 ± 40.00 ms, respectively. The average packet loss rate was less than 0.01% at both ends. The evaluation of the remote surgeons' intraoperative experience excellent. A total of 6 adverse events occurred and none were related to the instruments of robot. No postoperative complications of Clavien-Dindo grade III-IV occurred. No serious or repairable equipment failure occurred at either the remote or local end.

conclusionsIt is feasible to perform urological telesurgery over the 5G high-speed remote communication network to overcome geographical barriers and improve patient care.

Indexed as

Robotic Surgical ProceduresUrologic Surgical ProceduresAdultAgedBlood Loss, SurgicalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimePostoperative ComplicationsProstatectomyTelemedicine5G networkRemote surgeryRobotic surgeryTelesurgeryUrology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.