ArticleSurgical endoscopy2025
Automatic recognition of surgical phase of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy based on artificial intelligence deep-learning model and its application in surgical skill evaluation: a joint study of 18 medical education centers.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Applications of artificial intelligence in robot-assisted surgery: a systematic review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence, surgical vision, and digital navigation in robotic urology: a bibliometric and knowledge-mapping analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Automated recognition of surgical phases in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using a Hiera-based vision transformer.BJU international · 2026Article
- Response to 'Methodological considerations on artificial intelligence-based phase recognition in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy'.BJU international · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence-based approaches to augmenting and automating surgical training.BJU international · 2026Review
- The future of robotic surgery in the age of artificial intelligence.Nature reviews. Urology · 2026Review
- Concordance among experts in assessing apical mucosal preservation during holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP): implications for artificial intelligence model development.World journal of urology · 2025Article
- The Emerging Role of Multimodal Artificial Intelligence in Urological Surgery.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSurgical proficiency influences surgical quality and patient outcomes in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Manual video evaluations are labor-intensive and lack standardized objective metrics. Herein, we aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) deep-learning model that can identify the surgical phases in RARP videos and create a parameter-based scoring system to distinguish experts from novice surgeons based on the results of the AI model.
methodsA dataset of 410 RARP videos from 18 Japanese medical institutions was analyzed. The videos were annotated into 11 phases and divided into training and testing sets. Surgeons were categorized as experts or novices based on their RARP experience. We developed a deep-learning-based surgical phase classification model and compared the phase duration, number of transitions between phases, and AI confidence scores (AICS) between the groups based on the model's output. Key parameters were standardized and identified using stepwise multivariate logistic regression. A surgical skill scoring system was constructed based on the receiver operating characteristic curve cut-off values.
resultsOf the 213 videos, 99 were used for training, 20 for validation, and 94 for testing (61 experts and 33 novices). The model achieved an accuracy of 0.89 in identifying surgical phases. The experts had significantly shorter durations in phases 2-8 and higher AICS than the novices. Stepwise analysis identified phases 2 (Retzius space expansion), 7 (dorsal venous complex incision, apex treatment, hemostasis), and 8 (urethrovesical anastomosis) and the AICS as key predictors of expertise. The scoring system developed from these variables effectively distinguished experts from novices with an accuracy of 86.2%.
conclusionsThe developed AI model revealed that the duration of several surgical phases and AICS are key parameters in assessing surgical skill proficiency in RARP. The new scoring system established based on these indicators reliably differentiates expert from novice surgeons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40640619What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.