Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40640619›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2025

Automatic recognition of surgical phase of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy based on artificial intelligence deep-learning model and its application in surgical skill evaluation: a joint study of 18 medical education centers.

Xue Zhao, Shin Takenaka, Shuntaro Iuchi, Daichi Kitaguchi, Masashi Wakabayashi, Kodai Sato, Shintaro Arakaki, Kimimasa Sasaki, Norihito Kosugi, Nobushige Takeshita and 4 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Xue ZhaoDepartment of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan.
Shin TakenakaDepartment for the Promotion of Medical Device Innovation, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, 277-8577, Japan.
Shuntaro IuchiDepartment of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan.
Daichi KitaguchiDepartment for the Promotion of Medical Device Innovation, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, 277-8577, Japan.
Masashi WakabayashiBiostatistics Division, Center for Research Administration and Support, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, 277-8577, Japan.
Kodai SatoDepartment of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan.
Shintaro ArakakiDepartment for the Promotion of Medical Device Innovation, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, 277-8577, Japan.
Kimimasa SasakiDepartment for the Promotion of Medical Device Innovation, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, 277-8577, Japan.
Norihito KosugiDepartment for the Promotion of Medical Device Innovation, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, 277-8577, Japan.
Nobushige TakeshitaDepartment for the Promotion of Medical Device Innovation, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, 277-8577, Japan.
Nobuyoshi TakeshitaDepartment for the Promotion of Medical Device Innovation, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, 277-8577, Japan.
Shinichi SakamotoDepartment of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan.
Tomohiko IchikawaDepartment of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan.
Masaaki ItoDepartment for the Promotion of Medical Device Innovation, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, 277-8577, Japan. maito@east.ncc.go.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1101-2707

Funding

Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development JP23vk0124007JST SPRING JPMJSP2109
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurgical proficiency influences surgical quality and patient outcomes in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Manual video evaluations are labor-intensive and lack standardized objective metrics. Herein, we aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) deep-learning model that can identify the surgical phases in RARP videos and create a parameter-based scoring system to distinguish experts from novice surgeons based on the results of the AI model.

methodsA dataset of 410 RARP videos from 18 Japanese medical institutions was analyzed. The videos were annotated into 11 phases and divided into training and testing sets. Surgeons were categorized as experts or novices based on their RARP experience. We developed a deep-learning-based surgical phase classification model and compared the phase duration, number of transitions between phases, and AI confidence scores (AICS) between the groups based on the model's output. Key parameters were standardized and identified using stepwise multivariate logistic regression. A surgical skill scoring system was constructed based on the receiver operating characteristic curve cut-off values.

resultsOf the 213 videos, 99 were used for training, 20 for validation, and 94 for testing (61 experts and 33 novices). The model achieved an accuracy of 0.89 in identifying surgical phases. The experts had significantly shorter durations in phases 2-8 and higher AICS than the novices. Stepwise analysis identified phases 2 (Retzius space expansion), 7 (dorsal venous complex incision, apex treatment, hemostasis), and 8 (urethrovesical anastomosis) and the AICS as key predictors of expertise. The scoring system developed from these variables effectively distinguished experts from novices with an accuracy of 86.2%.

conclusionsThe developed AI model revealed that the duration of several surgical phases and AICS are key parameters in assessing surgical skill proficiency in RARP. The new scoring system established based on these indicators reliably differentiates expert from novice surgeons.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceDeep LearningProstatectomyRobotic Surgical ProceduresArtificial IntelligenceHumansJapanMaleVideo RecordingArtificial intelligenceAutomatic evaluation systemRobot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP)Surgical phase recognitionSurgical skills evaluation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.