ArticleJournal of human hypertension2025
Credence of device acceptability: a statistical method for comparing blood pressure measurement device accuracy across studies.
Article in Journal of human hypertension, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advancements and challenges in blood pressure monitoring using pulse wave propagation: a comprehensive review and ISO 81060-2 based statistical analysis.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate blood pressure measurement (BPM) is critical for managing hypertension, a leading global health concern. While international standards like ISO 81060-2 are applied to ensure commercial BPM device safety and effectiveness, gauging compliance earlier in research and development can be challenging. This study proposes an enhanced statistical evaluation framework that calculates a credence of device acceptability, aligned with international standards, which can be used to assess and compare results of device evaluation experiments having various sample sizes, blood pressure ranges, mean, standard deviation and correlations in error. Applied to ten studies featuring diverse BPM methods, the framework demonstrates its capability to provide insights beyond the face-value application of the performance criteria of international standards. This framework advances BPM technology by providing more appropriate tools to assess device accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.