ArticleScientific reports2025
Interplay of polymorphisms in sex hormone receptors and facial sexual differentiation in shaping prosocial behavior.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Numerous studies have examined how morphological features showing sex differences relate to prosocial behaviors, often yielding contradictory results. However, these studies have never simultaneously considered the affinity of sex hormone receptors alongside variables such as sex-related facial morphology. In this study, we analyze their combined effect on behavior in three economic games: the prisoner's dilemma, the dictator game, and the ultimatum game, as well as participants' considerations regarding these games. Our results indicate that facial morphology and genetic polymorphisms in sex hormone receptors associated with hormone-binding affinity have an effect on prosocial behavior. These effects are often significant in women but not in men. When polymorphisms are included in the models, facial shape difference emerges as a relevant variable. Regarding hormone receptors, polymorphisms in the androgen receptor and β estrogen receptor genes, but not in the α estrogen receptor, show behavioral effects. Short androgen receptor alleles are associated with making larger offers and expecting less generosity. In women, greater facial differentiation shows similar effects, while larger β estrogen receptor alleles are linked to requiring higher offers. Overall, our findings point to the value of jointly considering receptor affinity and proxies for hormone exposure when exploring their relationship with prosocial behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.