Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40640490›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2025

Stay calm in crowds: Avoiding emotional faces in ensemble perception.

Xin Luo, Megan Bartlett, Michael E R Nicholls

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xin LuoCollege of Education, Psychology and Social Work, Flinders University, Sturt Road, Bedford Park, SA, 5042, Australia. xin.luo@flinders.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-2239-838X
Megan BartlettSchool of Psychology, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5371-7676
Michael E R NichollsCollege of Education, Psychology and Social Work, Flinders University, Sturt Road, Bedford Park, SA, 5042, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7072-3744

Funding

College of Education, Psychology and Social work, Flinders University HDR award 13694
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous research has shown that people tend to display attentional biases toward faces with strong emotions within crowds, often overestimating the extremity of the average emotional expression. However, this emotional amplification effect has not been consistently observed in tasks where observers summarize other crowd features, such as the number of faces. This study aims to explore the attentional mechanisms underlying these inconsistent findings. To do so, we recruited 584 participants across four online experiments and employed an equivalence judgment task to assess participants' ability to estimate the number of emotional faces. In the task, participants determined whether the number of two types of facial expressions within a series of crowds was the "same" or "different." Experiment 1 revealed that the number of emotional faces (angry and happy) was underestimated relative to neutral faces. Experiment 2 replicated this underestimation effect across different face types and exposure durations. Experiment 3 demonstrated that the emotional amplification effect may be caused by strong emotion contrasts within crowds. Experiment 4 confirmed that the underestimation of the number of emotional faces could be replicated in the numerosity estimation task with different instructions. Our findings suggest that people may strategically suppress attention to emotional faces to mitigate their emotional response. This study provides important empirical evidence to enhance our understanding of the cognitive processes underlying emotion perception and social behavior.

Indexed as

AttentionAttentional BiasEmotionsFacial ExpressionFacial RecognitionSocial PerceptionAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansJudgmentMaleYoung AdultAttentional biasesEmotional processingEnsemble perceptionFacial expressions

Identifiers

PMID40640490
PMCPMC12331794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.