SynthesisJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2025
Live birth and other reproductive outcomes of mosaic and euploid embryos: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effect of sperm DNA fragmentation on embryo euploidy rate in assisted reproductive technologies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of medical research · 2025Pooled it
- Mosaic embryos result in equivalent live birth rates when compared to euploid embryos following frozen embryo transfer.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2026Article
- Association of estradiol and progesterone levels on human chorionic gonadotropin day with pregnancy outcomes in IVF/ICSI fresh embryo transfer.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Reclaiming 'abnormal' embryos after preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: patients' perspectives on transferring embryos against prior institutional advice.Human reproduction open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advances in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) have improved embryo selection in assisted reproductive technologies (ART). However, the clinical significance of mosaic embryos remains uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates reproductive outcomes following mosaic embryo transfer compared to euploid embryos. Live birth rate was the primary outcome, while secondary outcomes included biochemical pregnancy, biochemical pregnancy loss, miscarriage, clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, and neonatal outcomes. Our findings indicate that mosaic embryos have significantly lower implantation and live birth rates than euploid embryos, reinforcing the superior reproductive potential of euploid embryos. However, once implantation occurs, biochemical pregnancy loss and miscarriage rates were comparable between groups, suggesting that implantation is the primary limiting factor in mosaic embryo viability. The type and extent of mosaicism may further influence reproductive outcomes, with segmental mosaicism showing better prognoses than whole-chromosome mosaicism. Additionally, a trend toward lower birth weight in mosaic embryos was observed, though neonatal health outcomes remained as favorable as euploid embryos. The heterogeneity in diagnostic and reporting criteria highlights the need for standardized classification of mosaicism to enhance prognostic accuracy. Further research is required to refine embryo selection strategies and improve clinical decision-making in ART.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.