ArticleScientific reports2025
Exploring the impact of three meteorological factors and their specific effect sizes on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease admission in Qingyang, China.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Walking for Health: Franz Tappeiner (1816-1902), Meran, and the Origins of Public Health-Oriented Physical Activity.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- Deep learning model to predict COPD hospital admissions based on meteorological data: a medical meteorological forecast.Frontiers in big data · 2026Article
- Extreme and moderate temperatures and risk of hospitalizations for pulmonary hypertension: an 11-year time-series study in Shanghai, China.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
It's unclear exactly how variations in a number of meteorological factors relate to the chance of being hospitalized with COPD. The majority of earlier research was incomplete and non-systematic, describing only the association between a single climatic element and hospitalization for COPD. The results were often inconsistent. The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between three meteorological factors (temperature, DTR, and relative humidity) and the daily hospital admissions of COPD in Qingyang, China, as well as to examine the lag effects of each meteorological indicator on various subgroups. Based on daily COPD hospital admissions and meteorological data in Qingyang City, China, from 2015 to 2019, a generalized additive model (GAM) combined with a distributed lag non-linear model (DLNM) was used to examine the effects of three meteorological factors on COPD hospital admissions. At the same time, the 95th and 5th percentiles were utilized as the high and low effect nodes of each meteorological index to assess its relationship with COPD admission. Temperature, DTR, and relative humidity exhibited inverted J-, M-, and W-shaped exposure-response relationships with COPD admission. The negative effects of the cold effect and high DTR reached their peak at lag0-21. The RR values were 1.867 (95%CI:1.624,2.148) and 1.542 (95%CI:1.215,1.959), respectively. The highest negative effect of low humidity was in lag0-7, with RR values of 1.239 (95% CI:1.116,1.374). The three factors had a greater negative impact on those over 65 years old. Women were more susceptible to the cold, but men were more vulnerable to high DTR and low humidity. The study found significant correlations between meteorological factors and COPD hospitalizations. Lower temperatures, higher diurnal temperature variation, and lower humidity were associated with increased admission risks, with differential impacts observed across age groups and genders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.