ArticleScientific reports2025
Context-dependent effects of formic acid on olfactory learning and generalisation in ants.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Animals use learning and memory to recognise cues that predict rewards or punishments, allowing flexible decision-making. When facing new stimuli, they often generalise - responding similarly to different but related cues - enabling adaptive behaviour despite natural variation. Pheromones, chemical signals central to social interactions, are known to affect learning and memory, but their role in generalisation is unknown. This study explores how formic acid, an alarm pheromone in Camponotus aethiops ants, influences odour discrimination and generalisation in an appetitive olfactory discrimination learning task. Using controlled conditioning, we found that formic acid affected learning asymmetrically: it enhanced discrimination when octanal was rewarded and hexanal punished but not when hexanal was rewarded and octanal punished, suggesting a shift in learning priorities. Unexpectedly, formic acid also increased responses to conditioned stimuli and novel odours but only when octanal was the rewarded stimulus. These findings suggest that formic acid modulates associative learning and generalisation in a context-dependent way. Rather than acting solely as an arousal trigger, formic acid appears to reshape cognitive processing by altering stimulus discrimination and odour sensitivity. This highlights a novel role for alarm pheromones in modulating cognition, with broader implications for understanding chemical communication in social insects and beyond.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.