ArticleScientific reports2025
Sexual dimorphism in response to intermittent fasting and its impact on the brain.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intermittent fasting protects against stress-induced depression and demyelination via the gut microbiota-brain axis.Translational psychiatry · 2026Article
- Sex-Specific Responses to Intermittent Fasting: A Narrative Review Across Physiological, Clinical, and Psychosocial Contexts.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Changes in the brain [NADFrontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Review
- Nutritional timing and stress biology: intermittent fasting as a hormetic signal for adaptation.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
- Intermittent fasting and neuroprotection in Alzheimer's disease: metabolic mechanisms, cellular signaling, and brain-peripheral crosstalk.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Intermittent fasting (IF) has been shown to improve cognitive functions in rodent models. In addition, IF significantly reduces mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) expression. We hypothesized that IF would reduce mTOR signaling while improving memory and strength in healthy rats. 10-week-old male and female Fischer-344 rats (n = 48) were randomly assigned to four groups: ad libitum (AL)-male, IF-male, AL-female, IF-female. The IF group had full access to food on an every-other-day basis for 10 weeks. After 10 weeks, memory and strength were assessed. Following testing, brain and skeletal muscles were isolated, weighed and mTOR pathway proteins were quantified via Jess Simple Western. Prism GraphPad was used to determine group differences (one-way ANOVA) and correlations (Pearson) with alpha 0.05. After 10 weeks of IF, only males experienced IF-induced body mass (p < 0.0001) and average daily food intake (p = 0.014) declines. Further, IF males displayed better memory performance compared to AL counterparts (p = 0.0186). Brain mass was lower in both males (p = 0.0038) and females (p = 0.0205) compared to respective AL counterparts while hippocampal mass was maintained. Weight loss in males correlated with reduced mTOR expression in the brain cortex (r = 0.546, p = 0.006) and mTOR was significantly reduced in IF males cortex (vs. AL males p = 0.0003) and skeletal muscle (EDL: vs. AL males p = 0.0377). IF reduced average food intake and inhibited the mTOR pathway in the cortex of male rats while improving memory. IF did not have a significant effect in female rats.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.