ArticleScientific reports2025
Automated tick classification using deep learning and its associated challenges in citizen science.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Citizen Science Tick Observations Serve as an Early Warning System for Tick-Borne Diseases.Zoonoses and public health · 2026Article
- Projecting tick-borne encephalitis risk in Sweden under climate change scenarios: a high-resolution spatio-temporal modeling approach.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2026Article
- 12S rRNA based phylogeny and genetic diversity of Haemaphysalis spinigera, the primary vector for Kyasanur forest disease in India.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Potentials and limitations in the application of Convolutional Neural Networks for mosquito species identification using wing images.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lyme borreliosis and tick-borne encephalitis significantly impact public health in Europe, transmitted primarily by endemic tick species. The recent introduction of exotic tick species into northern Europe via migratory birds, imported animals, and travelers highlights the urgent need for rapid detection and accurate species identification. To address this, the Swedish Veterinary Agency launched a citizen science initiative, resulting in the submission of over 15,000 tick images spanning seven species. We developed, trained, and evaluated deep learning models incorporating image analysis, object detection, and transfer learning to support automated tick classification. The EfficientNetV2M model achieved a macro recall of 0.60 and a Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC) of 0.55 on out-of-distribution, citizen-submitted data. These results demonstrate the feasibility of integrating AI with citizen science for large-scale tick monitoring while also highlighting challenges related to class imbalance, species similarity, and morphological variability. Rather than robust species-level classification, our framework serves as a proof of concept for infrastructure that supports scalable and adaptive tick surveillance. This work lays the groundwork for future AI-driven systems in One Health contexts, extendable to other arthropod vectors and emerging public health threats.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.