ArticleNPJ digital medicine2025
Benchmarking vision-language models for diagnostics in emergency and critical care settings.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Underutilized Ocular Fundus in Emergency Departments: Current Progress and Future Prospect of Imaging and Artificial Intelligence for Patient Care.Ophthalmology science · 2026Review
- Do Accuracy Gains Reflect Genuine Visual Understanding? A Multi-Model Evaluation of Vision-Language Models in Thoracic Imaging.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- An Empirical Evaluation of Low-Rank Adapted Vision-Language Models for Radiology Image Captioning.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Large Language Models in Critical Care Medicine: Scoping Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The applicability of vision-language models (VLMs) for acute care in emergency and intensive care units remains underexplored. Using a multimodal dataset of diagnostic questions involving medical images and clinical context, we benchmarked several small open-source VLMs against GPT-4o. While open models demonstrated limited diagnostic accuracy (up to 40.4%), GPT-4o significantly outperformed them (68.1%). Findings highlight the need for specialized training and optimization to improve open-source VLMs for acute care applications.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.