Trial reportScientific reports2025
Transcutaneous electrical stimulation in chronic post-stroke oropharyngeal dysphagia: pooled biomechanical and kinematic analysis from a one-year randomized controlled clinical trial.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effects of speech therapy with or without transcutaneous electrical stimulation on patients with vocal cord paralysis after thoracic surgery.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oropharyngeal dysphagia in chronic post-stroke (PS-OD) patients is associated with impaired oropharyngeal sensory/motor function. We aimed to evaluate the effect of transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TES) on the biomechanics and kinetics of swallowing in PS-OD patients in a randomized controlled clinical trial with 1-year follow-up. 71 PS-OD patients with impaired safety of swallow (ISS) were randomized into 2 groups, (1) 26 with compensatory treatment (CT): thickeners and texture-modified diets, and (2) 45 with active treatment (TES + CT) with 2 cycles of TES (VitalStim; Enovis, USA), at baseline and 6 months. Each TES cycle consisted of 15 1-hour sessions over 2 weeks. Its effect was assessed by videofluoroscopy (baseline, post-treatment 1, 6 months, post-treatment 2, 12 months). Both groups were homogeneous, patients had 74.41 ± 11.28 years (31.00% women), functional decline (Barthel 72 ± 31), comorbidities (Charlson 3.00 ± 1.57), nutritional risk (MNA-sf 10.29 ± 2.59) and moderate stroke (NIHSS 3.35 ± 4.01). All had ISS (penetration-aspiration scale [PAS] 4.61 ± 1.67, only 9.86% could swallow thin liquid safely) and biomechanical delay (time to laryngeal vestibular closure [LVC] 402.82 ± 111.98ms). Swallowing parameters improved significantly between baseline and 12 months in the TES group (ISS, p < 0.001; PAS, safe thin liquid hydration, LVC, p < 0.0001; bolus kinematics, p < 0.05). No changes were observed in hyoid bone movement or timing. The CT group did not show any significant biomechanical changes. No relevant adverse events were associated with TES. TES is a safe and effective therapy for PS-OD. After 1 year of follow up, it improved ISS, time to LVC, bolus kinetics, and reduced the need for thickening agents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.