ArticleScientific reports2025
Effect of interacting minds on response criterion in two person perceptual decision making.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dyadic interaction enhances sensitivity and shifts decision criterion in a change detection task.Frontiers in cognition · 2026Article
- Attempts to investigate what words trivia experts focus on in quiz questions: Human-AI comparison through "LLM-as-a-judge" approach.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Previous studies have indicated that two-person judgments are more accurate than individual judgments in perceptual decision-making. Most studies have indicated that the improvement of performance accuracy reflects changes in visual sensitivity by using a bias-free paradigm to eliminate the effects of decision criteria. However, biases in judgment are natural during daily decision-making. Therefore, we should carefully consider the effect of response bias on two-person decision-making. Thus, this study investigated changes in two-person decision-making using signal detection theory. We conducted two experiments. The results of the two experiments revealed that not only does two-person judgment improve perceptual sensitivity but also shifts the decision criterion. This study provides new insights into response bias as a factor for better understanding two-person interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.