ArticleScientific reports2025
Lightweight machine learning framework for efficient DDoS attack detection in IoT networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A resource efficient IoT intrusion detection model using hybrid feature selection for edge computing.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- APATCP: programmable multi-controller framework for real-time detection and mitigation of complex TCP flooding attacks in SD-IoT networks.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Gentle-Sketch: a high-performance and compact invertible sketch for top-K estimation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- NIDS-Mamba: Lightweight Network Intrusion Detection for IoT Sensor Networks via State Space Models.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Smart assistive technologies for neurodisorders: A review on AI, IoT, and wearable systems for enhanced patient care.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Review
- SFARP: a multi-layered real-time security framework for hybrid ARP and DDoS attack defense in SD-IoT networks.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid proliferation of Internet of Things (IoT) devices has introduced significant security challenges, with Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks posing a critical threat to network integrity. Traditional detection methods often rely on computationally intensive models, rendering them unsuitable for resource-constrained IoT environments. To address this limitation, this study proposes a lightweight and scalable machine learning-based DDoS detection framework specifically designed for IoT networks. Utilizing the NSL-KDD dataset, the framework employs an Extra Trees Classifier (ETC) for feature selection, reducing dimensionality while retaining critical attributes. Reduced features were selected to enhance performance and reduce processing cost. Three supervised learning models, Random Forest, Logistic Regression, and Naïve Bayes, were implemented and evaluated based on their detection accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. Experimental results demonstrate that the Random Forest model achieves exceptional accuracy (99.88%), precision (99.93%), recall (99.81%), and F1-score (99.87%), outperforming both Logistic Regression (91.61% accuracy) and Naïve Bayes (87.62% accuracy). Furthermore, the proposed framework significantly reduces computational overhead compared to deep learning-based approaches, making it highly suitable for IoT deployments. This research advances IoT security by providing a scalable, efficient, and accurate solution for detecting DDoS attacks, thereby bridging the gap between high-performance requirements and resource limitations in real-world IoT applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.