ArticleScientific reports2025
A novel meta-heuristic algorithm based on candidate cooperation and competition.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Lie group-based hybrid optimization framework for multi-objective UAV path planning using L-VGWO.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traditional meta-heuristic algorithms are often inspired by natural phenomena or biological behaviors, while relatively few are based on human social behavior. Moreover, existing algorithms inspired by human social behavior often suffer from premature convergence and getting trapped in local optima. To address these limitations, we propose a novel metaheuristic algorithm called the Candidates Cooperative Competitive Algorithm (CCCA), which is inspired by distinctive human social behaviors and designed for continuous optimization problems. CCCA consists of two main stages: self-study and mutual influence among candidates. The mutual influence stage includes various cooperative behaviors, such as one-on-one and many-to-one assistance, collaborative discussions among outstanding candidates, and targeted support for average candidates. Additionally, it incorporates competitive mechanisms, including contests among top-performing candidates and elimination strategies. We apply CCCA to solve 23 classical test functions, comparing them with PSO, FA, CSA, HMS, ICA, TLBO, and BSO. The results demonstrate that CCCA outperforms the compared algorithms, achieving optimal solutions in 9 functions. The convergence trends indicate that CCCA has a strong ability to escape local optima in 7 unimodal and multimodal functions. Statistical analysis using the Mann-Whitney U test confirms that CCCA achieves significant performance improvements in over 90% of the test cases. We also compare CCCA with recently developed human-inspired algorithms and obtain similarly competitive results. These findings further underscore the feasibility and robustness of CCCA. Moreover, its successful application to the capacity allocation problem highlights its practical effectiveness and superiority.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.