Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40640284›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A novel meta-heuristic algorithm based on candidate cooperation and competition.

Yue Cong, Bingnan Yang, Jie Wei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yue CongModern Business School, Zhejiang Agricultural Business College, Shaoxing, 312088, China.
Bingnan YangSchool of Economics Management and Law, Hubei Normal University, Huangshi, 435002, China.
Jie WeiSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430074, China. wjjj@hust.edu.cn.

Funding

Department of Education of Zhejiang Province FX2024219PT
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional meta-heuristic algorithms are often inspired by natural phenomena or biological behaviors, while relatively few are based on human social behavior. Moreover, existing algorithms inspired by human social behavior often suffer from premature convergence and getting trapped in local optima. To address these limitations, we propose a novel metaheuristic algorithm called the Candidates Cooperative Competitive Algorithm (CCCA), which is inspired by distinctive human social behaviors and designed for continuous optimization problems. CCCA consists of two main stages: self-study and mutual influence among candidates. The mutual influence stage includes various cooperative behaviors, such as one-on-one and many-to-one assistance, collaborative discussions among outstanding candidates, and targeted support for average candidates. Additionally, it incorporates competitive mechanisms, including contests among top-performing candidates and elimination strategies. We apply CCCA to solve 23 classical test functions, comparing them with PSO, FA, CSA, HMS, ICA, TLBO, and BSO. The results demonstrate that CCCA outperforms the compared algorithms, achieving optimal solutions in 9 functions. The convergence trends indicate that CCCA has a strong ability to escape local optima in 7 unimodal and multimodal functions. Statistical analysis using the Mann-Whitney U test confirms that CCCA achieves significant performance improvements in over 90% of the test cases. We also compare CCCA with recently developed human-inspired algorithms and obtain similarly competitive results. These findings further underscore the feasibility and robustness of CCCA. Moreover, its successful application to the capacity allocation problem highlights its practical effectiveness and superiority.

Indexed as

Candidates cooperative competitive algorithmHuman social behaviorMeta-heuristic algorithmOptimization

Identifiers

PMID40640284
PMCPMC12246101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.