ArticleScientific reports2025
Native Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium probiotics modulate autophagy genes and exert anti-inflammatory effect.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- The Mechanistic Crosstalk between Probiotics, ncRNAs, and Autophagy: Implications for Colorectal Cancer Precision Medicine.Expert reviews in molecular medicine · 2026Review
- The Gut Microbiota-Tryptophan-Brain Axis in Autism Spectrum Disorder: A New Frontier for Probiotic Intervention.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- Role of gut microbiota in melanosis coli: from anthraquinone biotransformation to mucosal homeostasis dysbiosis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Crosstalk Among Gut Microbiota, Microbial Metabolites, and Inflammatory Cytokines: Current Understanding and Future Directions.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Application and Challenges of Using ProbioticDiseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Molecular Mechanisms of Probiotic Action Against Gastrointestinal Cancers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Probiotics are beneficial microorganisms that modulate various signaling pathways to improve human health status. In this study we aimed to evaluate the precise molecular effects of Lactobacillus spp., Bifidobacterium spp., and a mixture of our native potential probiotics on the autophagy signaling pathway during the presence of inflammation. The evaluation of autophagy gene expression was performed after exposing the HT -29 cell line with the sonicated pathogens and probiotics, before and simultaneously with inflammation induction by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and cytokine assays. The results of the current study showed that our native potential probiotic cocktails could upregulate the expression level of the autophagy genes including pik3c3, atg14, beclin, pik3r4, atg5, atg16, atg7, and atg3 compared with sonicated pathogen treatments, and also these native potential probiotic strains could exert anti-inflammatory effects, especially before inflammation induction. In conclusion, our native potential probiotic cocktail indicated the preventive and therapeutic effect on inflammation, but our selected probiotics could affect autophagy genes stronger before inflammation compared to expose simultaneously with inflammation. Therefore, the administration of probiotics as a prophylactic agent with the least side effects could be considered a suitable treatment for patients with inflammatory-related disease, even before or at the beginning of inflammation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.