ArticleScientific reports2025
Associations between the SMARS score derived from CT and MRI with histopathological features in HCC.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prediction of Ki-67 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma: a dual-center study based on T2-weighted imaging habitat analysis.Radiology and oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There are complex associations between the imaging phenotype and underlying histopathology of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC). The recently proposed SMARS score (acronym comprising Shape of tumour, Mosaic architecture, AFP level, Rim APHE, and Satellite lesion) could discriminate proliferative and non-proliferative HCC tumours in a non-invasive way and was associated with treatment outcomes. However, a systematic validation of this score is needed and it is unclear whether associations with histopathology features exist. The present study elucidates possible correlations between the SMARS score defined by CT and MRI images with immunohistochemistry features of the pathological specimens in a curatively treated HCC cohort. A total of 44 patients (mean age: 59.6 ± 10.7 years) with histologically confirmed HCC, who underwent curative surgical resection, were included in the present analysis. Contrast enhanced MRI and CT images were performed before surgery and the SMARS score was calculated. The pathological specimens were analyzed for programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), Glypican-3, CD3-tumour infiltrating lymphocyte, CD68 positive cells, CD34 positive microvessel density (MVD). The median SMARS score derived from MRI images was 1.4 (interquartile range: -0.32; 2.18) and from CT images it was - 0.32 (interquartile range: -1.08; 0.56). According to the proposed threshold, 29 tumours were categorized as proliferative HCC (82.9%) and six tumours as nonproliferative HCC (17.1%) accordingly to the MRI SMARS score. According to the CT SMARS score 24 tumours were categorized as proliferative HCC (61.5%) and 15 as nonproliferative HCC (38.5%). The SMARS score derived from MRI images showed no correlations with the PD-L1, CD68, CD3 and MVD parameters. However, a moderate association was shown between the SMARS score with the Glypican-3 expression (r = 0.37, p = 0.03). The SMARS score derived from CT images, instead, showed correlations with two of the PD-L1 parameters (for PD-L1 tumour positive score r=-0.37, p = 0.02 and for PD-L1 combined positive score r=-0.35, p = 0.03) while no other association with the remaining parameters was detected. The SMARS score as a promising novel imaging score is associated with the Glypican-3 and PD-L1 expression in curatively treated HCC patients. Differences between the CT and MRI defined score needs to be investigated in further trials on larger patient cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.