Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40640264›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A Multi-Scale attention network for building extraction from high-resolution remote sensing images.

Jing Chang, Xiaohui He, Dingjun Song, Panle Li, Mengjia Qiao, Xijie Cheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jing ChangSchool of Computer and Artificial Intelligence, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450001, China.
Xiaohui HeSchool of Geoscience and Technology, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450001, China. hexh@zzu.edu.cn.
Dingjun SongSchool of Computer and Artificial Intelligence, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450001, China.
Panle LiSchool of Geoscience and Technology, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450001, China.
Mengjia QiaoSchool of Geoscience and Technology, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450001, China.
Xijie ChengSchool of Geoscience and Technology, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450001, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The information in remote sensing images often leads to incomplete building contours and suboptimal adaptability to complex building scenes. To address these issues, we propose a novel multi-scale network with dual attention mechanisms to extract clear building boundaries. The Squeeze-and-Excitation (SE) module is employed to bolster feature extraction, and the Atrous Spatial Pyramid Pooling (ASPP) module is integrated to capture multi-scale feature information. Then, in the decoding phase, channel grouping shuffle and dual attention mechanisms are synergistically integrated to exploit the interrelations and global dependencies of building features. Finally, a hybrid loss function is devised to address the class imbalance and thereby ensure more stable network training. Experimental evaluations on two high-resolution remote sensing datasets, Zimbabwe and Massachusetts, demonstrate that the proposed method markedly surpasses the performance of semantic segmentation networks such as PSPnet, U-net, and DAnet in terms of accuracy, recall, F1 score, and Mean Intersection over Union (MIoU), achieving an F1 score of up to 83.23% and an MIoU of 73.56%. This multi-scale attention network holds substantial promise for practical applications in building extraction.

Indexed as

Deep learningDual attention mechanismMulti-Scale feature integrationResidual module

Identifiers

PMID40640264
PMCPMC12246097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.