Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40640251›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Leveraging machine learning techniques for image classification and revealing social media insights into human engagement with urban wild spaces.

Haider Khalid, Marcus J Collier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Haider KhalidSchool of Computer Science and Statistics, ADAPT Research Centre, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. khalidh@tcd.ie.
Marcus J CollierSchool of Natural Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, machine learning models have exhibited excellent performance and far-reaching impact across domains such as fraud detection in finance, recommendation systems in e-commerce, medical imaging in healthcare, agricultural forecasting, social engagement, image classification, sentiment analysis in social media network analysis. This research explores how advanced machine learning techniques, leveraging social media data for image classification, can be used to gain deeper insights into public engagement with urban wild spaces. The study follows a two-step methodology: first, scraping image data from Instagram, Facebook, and Flickr using hashtag-based techniques focused on urban wild spaces; second, developing an experimental pipeline using Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), Density-Based Spatial Clustering of Applications with Noise (DBSCAN), and Convolutional Autoencoders (CAE) to classify and evaluate the scrapped social media data. Evaluation was based on precision, recall, F-measure, and accuracy metrics. Across all three platforms, CAE consistently outperformed CNN and DBSCAN, achieving peak accuracies of 74.8% on Flickr, 70.4% on Instagram, and 62.9% on Facebook, along with balanced F-measures and high recall. CNN showed the highest precision, reaching 98.4% on Flickr, while DBSCAN provided moderate results. These findings show that machine learning effectively filters noisy data and reveals how people engage with urban wild spaces, offering valuable insights for urban planning and ecology.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedMachine LearningSocial MediaCitiesHumansNeural Networks, ComputerData scrapingHuman engagementImage classificationSocial media analysisUrbanWildSpaces

Identifiers

PMID40640251
PMCPMC12246402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.