ArticleScientific reports2025
Complex regional pain syndrome and use of psychotropic drugs as a proxy for psychological health.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We aimed to investigate the association between psychotropic drug use (proxy for psychological health) and Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) type 1 and type 2 in upper and lower limbs. We also assessed the impact of demographic and socioeconomic factors. From a national record linkage database [4,706,821 individuals (25-64 years); CRPS type 1 = 809; type 2 = 225], prevalence ratios (PR), absolute risk (AR), and AR difference (ARD) [95% confidence intervals (CI)] were estimated by logistic and Cox regressions with constant time at risk. About 36% of CRPS individuals consumed psychotropic drugs (reference: general population 15%). Unadjusted PRs were two times higher in nerve injuries/disorders without CRPS [PR = 1.78; 95% CI: 1.73-1.82] and CRPS type 1 [2.33 (2.07-2.62)] and almost three times higher in CRPS type 2 [2.79 (2.27-3.42)]. Higher ARDs were observed in type 2, independent of level of income, and were higher for the high-income category. In type 2, ARDs were higher for middle-high/high occupational status levels. Higher ARDs were observed in nerve injuries/nerve disorders, CRPS type 1, and type 2 in immigrants, especially high for type 2. Regarding most age intervals, ARDs were higher for individuals with CRPS type 2. Individuals with CRPS, especially type 2, have high risk of impaired psychological health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.