Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40640231›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

An intelligent referee selection approach in martial arts using CoCoSo MCDM algorithm.

Tao Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Tao ZhangPhysical Education, Shaanxi University of Technology, Hanzhong, 723000, Shaanxi, China. 18992640390@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Martial arts tournament regulation requires strict adherence to principles which include fairness and both disciplined behavior and accurate decision-making processes. Competition martial arts need referees to uphold integrity by carrying out fair rule enforcement together with exact decision-making responsibilities. The selection process for referees becomes problematic due to unclear evaluation methods, which include decision unpredictability, together with subjective assessment, and qualifications that differ from one another. The research utilizes the CoCoSo multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) algorithm and interval-valued t-spherical fuzzy sets (IVTSFS) to process referee candidate evaluations with greater accuracy and methodically under uncertain situations. Three expert evaluators conduct assessments of different referee candidates through vital selection parameter analysis, which includes assessment of experience levels, along with decision accuracy rules, understanding physical fitness capabilities, stress management competencies, consistency performance, and communication abilities. Both the CoCoSo algorithm and IVTSFS system enable successful integration of expert judgments and handle ambiguous referee decision-making approaches respectively. The research presents an optimized process for athletic referee selection which guarantees fair competition and selects referees who demonstrate the best qualities during martial arts competitions.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDecision MakingMartial ArtsFuzzy LogicHumansCoCoSo algorithmDecision accuracyInterval-valued t-spherical fuzzy informationMartial artsMulti-criteria decision-makingReferee selection

Identifiers

PMID40640231
PMCPMC12246077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.