ArticleScientific reports2025
The impact of intraoperative optical coherence tomography on cognitive load in virtual reality vitreoretinal surgery training.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Imaging: new techniques for imaging of the vitreous body].Die Ophthalmologie · 2026Review
- Toward comprehensive real-time scene understanding in ophthalmic surgery through multimodal image fusion.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026Article
- Mapping EEG Metrics to Human Affective and Cognitive Models: An Interdisciplinary Scoping Review from a Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ophthalmic surgeries consist of highly demanding microsurgical tasks that require surgeons to sustain mental focus and extreme manual dexterity for extended periods. To improve surgical precision and decision-making, intraoperative Optical Coherence Tomography (iOCT) has been integrated into surgical microscopes, offering cross-sectional imaging of anatomical tissues and instruments alongside the traditional microscopic view. While the clinical benefits of iOCT have been demonstrated across various ophthalmic procedures, the impact of this auxiliary information on the surgeon's cognitive load has not yet been explored. This work is the first study to investigate physiological and subjective cognitive load during simulated iOCT-guided retinal surgery in 17 novice users. The eye tracking capabilities of a virtual reality eye surgery simulator were used to capture blink rate and pupil diameter. Electrocardiography was used to record heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability (HRV). iOCT-guided surgery resulted in significantly higher cognitive load than traditional microscope-guided surgery, indicated by increased HR (p<0.01), HRV (p<0.05), subjective task load (p<0.001) (NASA-TLX, mental effort), and task time (p<0.001). However, our findings indicate that although iOCT initially imposed a higher cognitive load on novice users, it ultimately enhanced their depth-related targeting precision, which is crucial for improving surgical accuracy and overall outcomes in vitreoretinal surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.