ArticleScientific reports2025
Association of reproductive characteristics with osteoporosis and FRAX scores in Chinese postmenopausal women: a QCT-based cross-sectional study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Unveiling the non-linear synergistic effects of smoking and aging on cataract-AMD comorbidity: an explainable artificial intelligence approach.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reproductive characteristics, including age at menarche (AAM), age at natural menopause (ANM), and parity, may influence bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal women through the duration of estrogen exposure and the regulation of calcium homeostasis. Current Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) exclude these parameters, potentially limiting their accuracy in identifying high-risk individuals. This study aimed to investigate the associations between reproductive characteristics and the risk of osteoporosis, as well as the fracture probabilities derived from FRAX. This retrospective cross-sectional study included 417 postmenopausal women (aged 45-80 years) stratified by quantitative computed tomography (QCT)-measured lumbar volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) into osteoporotic (n = 63, vBMD ≤ 80 mg/cm³) and non-osteoporotic (n = 354) groups. We collected demographic, reproductive, clinical, and radiological data, and calculated four categories of FRAX scores: 10-year probabilities of major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) and hip fracture (HF), with/without BMD integration. Binary logistic regression analyzed associations between reproductive characteristics and osteoporosis risk. Generalized linear models with Gamma distribution and log-link function evaluated independent associations between reproductive characteristics and FRAX scores. The osteoporotic group exhibited earlier ANM (48.0 ± 3.8 vs. 49.9 ± 4.2 years, p = 0.005) and higher parity (2.5 ± 1.4 vs. 1.7 ± 1.0, p < 0.001). Logistic regression revealed earlier ANM (OR = 0.831, 95% CI: 0.789-0.875) and increased parity (OR = 1.345, 95% CI: 1.075-1.683) as independent risk factors for osteoporosis (p < 0.05). Generalized linear models demonstrated that each 1-year delay in menopause decreased FRAX scores: BMD-integrated MOF and HF risks decreased by 2.1% and 4.0%, while non-BMD risks decreased by 2.7% and 4.4% (p < 0.001). Conversely, each additional parity increased FRAX scores: BMD-integrated MOF and HF risks increased by 5.9% and 12.8%, and non-BMD risks increased by 4.6% and 8.0% (p < 0.05). Age, ANM, and parity consistently affected all FRAX scores consistently (p < 0.05). Earlier ANM and higher parity are significantly associated with elevated osteoporosis risk and FRAX scores. Incorporating these reproductive variables into the FRAX algorithms may improve the accuracy of identifying high-risk individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.