ArticleScientific reports2025
Joint contribution of adaptation and neuronal population recruitment to response level in visual area MT: a computational model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Adaptation is a form of short-term plasticity triggered by prolonged stimulus exposure, altering perceptual sensitivity to stimulus features through reduced neuronal firing rates. Our previous studies investigated adaptation to bistable stimuli, specifically inward-moving gratings perceived either as a plaid moving coherently downward or two gratings moving incoherently. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we have consistently observed a stronger response to incoherent rather than coherent motion. Possible mechanisms include stronger adaptation to coherent motion, greater neural involvement for the representation of incoherent motion or both. Here, we employ a computational model of visual neurons with and without firing rate adaptation to test these two hypotheses. By simulating the mean activity of thirty-two columnar populations of visual area MT, we investigate the impact of adaptation on the blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) signal. Our results replicate experimental findings only when the model includes adaptation. The simulated response to incoherent motion is larger for a variety of stimulus parameters and adaptation regimes, suggesting that the reduced response to coherent stimuli is due to smaller neuronal population activation. The model also explains differential motion after-effect responses. The joint role of adaptation and differential neuronal recruitment in bistable perception sheds light on mechanisms underlying experimental data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.