ArticleNature communications2025
Random access and semantic search in DNA data storage enabled by Cas9 and machine-guided design.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stimuli-responsive vesicles in water-resistant nanofibers for molecular random access in DNA data storage.Nanoscale advances · 2026Article
- Deep Learning Predicts Dissimilar DNA-DNA Binding and Engineers Hyperconnected Networks.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Thermo-Responsive Living Microspheroids Enable a Regenerative Living Disk-Drive System for DNA Data Storage.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-Driven Nanopore Sensing for Quantitative, Label-Free miRNA Detection.Small methods · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
DNA is a promising medium for digital data storage due to its exceptional data density and longevity. Practical DNA-based storage systems require selective data retrieval to minimize decoding time and costs. In this work, we introduce CRISPR-Cas9 as a user-friendly tool for multiplexed, low-latency molecular data extraction. We first present a one-pot, multiplexed random access method in which specific data files are selectively cleaved using a CRISPR-Cas9 addressing system and then sequenced via nanopore technology. This approach was validated on a pool of 1.6 million DNA sequences, comprising 25 unique data files. We then developed a molecular similarity-search approach combining machine learning with Cas9-based retrieval. Using a deep neural network, we mapped a database of 1.74 million images into a reduced-dimensional embedding, encoding each embedding as a Cas9 target sequence. These target sequences act as molecular addresses, capturing clusters of semantically related images. By leveraging Cas9's off-target cleavage activity, query sequences cleave both exact and closely related targets, enabling high-fidelity retrieval of molecular addresses corresponding to in silico image clusters similar to the query. These approaches move towards addressing key challenges in molecular data retrieval by offering simplified, rapid isothermal protocols and new DNA data access capabilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.