Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40640156›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Random access and semantic search in DNA data storage enabled by Cas9 and machine-guided design.

Carina Imburgia, Lee Organick, Karen Zhang, Nicolas Cardozo, Jeff McBride, Callista Bee, Delaney Wilde, Gwendolin Roote, Sofia Jorgensen, David Ward and 4 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Carina Imburgia *University of Washington, Paul G. Allen School of Computer Science and Engineering, Seattle, USA.
Lee Organick *University of Washington, Paul G. Allen School of Computer Science and Engineering, Seattle, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4822-5693
Karen Zhang *University of Washington, Paul G. Allen School of Computer Science and Engineering, Seattle, USA.
Nicolas Cardozo *University of Washington, Paul G. Allen School of Computer Science and Engineering, Seattle, USA.
Jeff McBrideUniversity of Washington, Paul G. Allen School of Computer Science and Engineering, Seattle, USA.
Callista BeeUniversity of Washington, Paul G. Allen School of Computer Science and Engineering, Seattle, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9687-8656
Delaney WildeUniversity of Washington, Paul G. Allen School of Computer Science and Engineering, Seattle, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5115-3208
Gwendolin RooteUniversity of Washington, Paul G. Allen School of Computer Science and Engineering, Seattle, USA.
Sofia JorgensenUniversity of Washington, Paul G. Allen School of Computer Science and Engineering, Seattle, USA.
David WardUniversity of Washington, Paul G. Allen School of Computer Science and Engineering, Seattle, USA.
Charlie AndersonUniversity of Washington, Paul G. Allen School of Computer Science and Engineering, Seattle, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-3059-937X
Karin StraussMicrosoft Research, Redmond, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8327-5477
Luis CezeUniversity of Washington, Paul G. Allen School of Computer Science and Engineering, Seattle, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1377-6217
Jeff NivalaUniversity of Washington, Paul G. Allen School of Computer Science and Engineering, Seattle, USA. jmdn@cs.washington.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8210-5417

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA is a promising medium for digital data storage due to its exceptional data density and longevity. Practical DNA-based storage systems require selective data retrieval to minimize decoding time and costs. In this work, we introduce CRISPR-Cas9 as a user-friendly tool for multiplexed, low-latency molecular data extraction. We first present a one-pot, multiplexed random access method in which specific data files are selectively cleaved using a CRISPR-Cas9 addressing system and then sequenced via nanopore technology. This approach was validated on a pool of 1.6 million DNA sequences, comprising 25 unique data files. We then developed a molecular similarity-search approach combining machine learning with Cas9-based retrieval. Using a deep neural network, we mapped a database of 1.74 million images into a reduced-dimensional embedding, encoding each embedding as a Cas9 target sequence. These target sequences act as molecular addresses, capturing clusters of semantically related images. By leveraging Cas9's off-target cleavage activity, query sequences cleave both exact and closely related targets, enabling high-fidelity retrieval of molecular addresses corresponding to in silico image clusters similar to the query. These approaches move towards addressing key challenges in molecular data retrieval by offering simplified, rapid isothermal protocols and new DNA data access capabilities.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Associated Protein 9CRISPR-Cas SystemsDNAInformation Storage and RetrievalMachine LearningSemanticsSequence Analysis, DNACRISPR-Associated Protein 9DNA

Identifiers

PMID40640156
PMCPMC12246221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.