ReviewNature communications2025
Blueprints for sustainable plant production through the utilization of crop wild relatives and their microbiomes.
Review in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Harnessing plant-exuded prebiotics as a next-generation strategy for sustainable agriculture.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2026Review
- Article
- Microbiome eco-evolution of cultivated and wild rice species across the genus Oryza and its importance in supporting rice growth.Microbiome · 2026Article
- Phylogenetic Divergence and Domestication Jointly Shape the Tomato Root Microbiome.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Plant-Mediated Soil Sickness: Steering the Rhizosphere into a Pathogenic Niche.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Mitigating Cd stress in alfalfa: the role of melatonin and nano-calcium oxide in enhancing photosynthesis and antioxidant defense.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Nitrogen-Centric Molecular Mechanisms in Crop Plants Under Elevated COPhysiologia plantarumReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conserving crop wild relatives (CWR) in their natural environments, together with the complex communities of microorganisms that live with them, could lay the foundation to unlock novel mechanisms for crop resilience and new strategies for achieving food security.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.