ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2025
Slice-to-Volume Reconstruction of Fetal Brain MR Imaging in Clinical Practice.
Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Slice-to-volume reconstruction (SVR) is used to generate 3D isotropic high-resolution MR images from multiple 2D stacks to correct for fetal motion. The purpose of this study is to develop an automated SVR pipeline for integration into clinical workflow. This prospective, institutional review board-approved study included pregnant women undergoing fetal MRI. In addition to standard of care (SOC), which includes 2D T2-single-shot fast spin echo (SSFSE) contiguous images at 3-4 mm slice thickness, 2D T2-SSFSE images at 2.5 mm with 1.25 mm overlap in 5 imaging planes were obtained as inputs. Twenty-two patients (29.3 ± 5.7 weeks gestational age) were included. Though scan time alone was not significantly different between SOC (8.9 ± 2.9 minutes) versus SVR (9.3 ± 1.7 minutes,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.