Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40639954›Full record

Trial reportRegional anesthesia and pain medicine2026

Objective, long-term mobility data in patients with chronic pain after lumbar spine surgery treated with spinal cord stimulation-a prospective, multicenter trial.

Tobias Hallén, Kaare Meier, Jan Willem Kallewaard, Bart Billet, Lars Elzinga, Johannes Schapendonk, Eric Van den Bosch, Xander Zuidema, Kristin Lilja Eyglóardóttir, Helga Gulisano and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Regional anesthesia and pain medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04710355 (Objective Long-term Data Recording of Daily Activity in Patients with Failed Back Surgery Syndrome Treated with Spinal Cord Stimulation - a Prospective 12-month Follow-up Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04710355 completednot on this map

Objective Long-term Data Recording of Daily Activity in Patients with Failed Back Surgery Syndrome Treated with Spinal Cord Stimulation - a Prospective 12-month Follow-up Study

TypeobservationalSponsorSahlgrenska University HospitalRan2020 to 2024Enrolled50ConditionsFailed Back Surgery SyndromeArmsSpinal cord stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Tobias HallénDepartment of Neurosurgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden tobias.hallen@neuro.gu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3628-7686
Kaare MeierDepartment of Neurosurgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Jan Willem KallewaardDepartment of Pain Management, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7681-1796
Bart BilletDepartment of Anesthesiology, AZ Delta, Roeselare, Belgium.
Lars ElzingaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Bravis Hospital, Roosendaal, The Netherlands.
Johannes SchapendonkDepartment of Anesthesiology, Diaconessenhuis Hospital, Zeist, The Netherlands.
Eric Van den BoschDepartment of Anesthesiology, MCL Leeuwarden, Netherlands, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands.
Xander ZuidemaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Diaconessenhuis Hospital, Zeist, The Netherlands.
Kristin Lilja EyglóardóttirDepartment of Neurosurgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Helga GulisanoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Kliment GatzinskyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSpinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a treatment option for chronic neuropathic pain conditions when conventional therapies have failed. However, objective and measurable long-term data on the effects of SCS are lacking. This study evaluates changes in objectively recorded mobility and the correlation with patient-reported outcomes in SCS-treated patients with intractable back and/or leg pain following lumbar spine surgery.

methodsFifty patients were enrolled. Baseline mobility was recorded over 4 weeks using an external neurostimulator with a built-in accelerometer. Patients achieving ≥50% pain relief during a subsequent SCS test trial received a permanently implanted stimulator at the same site. Mobility data were extracted at 3, 6, and 12 months and compared with baseline alongside work status, medication usage, and patient-reported outcome measures.

resultsThirty-seven patients received a permanent stimulator, and 32 completed the 12 month follow-up of activity data. Time spent in mobility episodes lasting at least 30 s was 34±27 min/24 hours for SCS-patients at baseline compared with 92±51 min for healthy controls (p=0.009). Mobility increased gradually after SCS, reaching statistical significance at 12 months (p=0.045). The increase was significant in patients with predominant leg pain (35±27 to 54±32 min, p=0.011) but not in those with predominant back pain. Significant improvements were observed in working ability, medication reduction, and self-reported outcomes. Increased mobility correlated significantly with reduction in self-reported disability (p=0.044) and leg pain (p=0.046).

conclusionThe new objective data indicate that SCS has beneficial, long-term effects on mobility in patients with intractable leg pain after spine surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04710355.

Indexed as

Chronic PainLumbar VertebraePostoperative PainSpinal Cord StimulationAdultAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresProspective StudiesTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeCHRONIC PAINPain ManagementSpinal Cord Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID40639954
PMCPMC13638309

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.